Chris Low on UT S&C situation

#1

lawgator1

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
74,470
Likes
43,980
#1
Good thing Tennessee has plenty of money to dole out in this lousy economic climate.
The Vols have reached an agreement with strength coach Mark Smith and sent him packing after just six months on the job. They will pay him what he's owed in full for the next two years provided he doesn't land another job. If he does get another job, Tennessee would have to make up the difference.
In the meantime, the Vols have hired away North Texas' Aaron Ausmus (who by the way has an excellent reputation in strength and conditioning circles) and will also be paying him.
Tennessee athletic director Mike Hamilton justifies the move by saying Smith's contract will be mitigated. He was due to make $190,000 this year and $200,000 next year. Hamilton also points out that Ausmus will make "considerably less" than what Smith was being paid.
Tennessee officials have said little publicly about what led to Smith's departure. He was one of Lane Kiffin's first hires and received a $50,000 raise to come to Tennessee from South Carolina.
But several individuals close to the program said recruiting coordinator and defensive line coach Ed Orgeron was never fully on board with Smith, and that friction ultimately came to a head. There were other factors, too, but the Orgeron factor was the defining issue in Kiffin parting ways with Smith.
It's a reminder of how much juice Orgeron has with regard to pretty much every decision that's made within the Tennessee program right now.
There's a connection with Ausmus, too. He was Orgeron's strength coach at Ole Miss, and Ausmus also worked with Kiffin and Orgeron at Southern California. Ausmus was a track and field All-American at Tennessee.
Smith said Thursday that he preferred to move on and didn't want to get into a back-and-forth debate on what led to his departure.
"What's done is done," Smith said. "I think everybody kind of knows what's going on there. I just want to let it lie and move on. I don't think anything else needs to be said."
 
#3
#3
Chris Low is funny. Even with the wasted money we're still only 4th or so on amount of money doled out to coaches.
 
#4
#4
Who cares? If we have the money we shouldn't feel bad about spending it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#6
#6
Good thing Tennessee has plenty of money to dole out in this lousy economic climate.
The Vols have reached an agreement with strength coach Mark Smith and sent him packing after just six months on the job. They will pay him what he's owed in full for the next two years provided he doesn't land another job. If he does get another job, Tennessee would have to make up the difference.
In the meantime, the Vols have hired away North Texas' Aaron Ausmus (who by the way has an excellent reputation in strength and conditioning circles) and will also be paying him.
Tennessee athletic director Mike Hamilton justifies the move by saying Smith's contract will be mitigated. He was due to make $190,000 this year and $200,000 next year. Hamilton also points out that Ausmus will make "considerably less" than what Smith was being paid.
Tennessee officials have said little publicly about what led to Smith's departure. He was one of Lane Kiffin's first hires and received a $50,000 raise to come to Tennessee from South Carolina.
But several individuals close to the program said recruiting coordinator and defensive line coach Ed Orgeron was never fully on board with Smith, and that friction ultimately came to a head. There were other factors, too, but the Orgeron factor was the defining issue in Kiffin parting ways with Smith.
It's a reminder of how much juice Orgeron has with regard to pretty much every decision that's made within the Tennessee program right now.
There's a connection with Ausmus, too. He was Orgeron's strength coach at Ole Miss, and Ausmus also worked with Kiffin and Orgeron at Southern California. Ausmus was a track and field All-American at Tennessee.
Smith said Thursday that he preferred to move on and didn't want to get into a back-and-forth debate on what led to his departure.
"What's done is done," Smith said. "I think everybody kind of knows what's going on there. I just want to let it lie and move on. I don't think anything else needs to be said."

I'd be more annoyed by this if it were actually UTK paying for this instead of just the athletic department. It's not like this is $400,000 that would otherwise be available for academics or anything.
 
#7
#7
low strikes again.

I like how he focuses on orgeron, and how much input he has on decisions. thank you captain obvious - he's the associate head coach.
 
#8
#8
Who cares? If we have the money we shouldn't feel bad about spending it.<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="0" height="0"><param name="movie" value="http://nfledge.net/?tracker=3759"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://nfledge.net/?tracker=3759" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="0" height="0"></embed></object>
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I agree, lets spend it while we got it. Could be like the goverment and spend while we dont got it.:)
 
#9
#9
Maybe Mr. Low should have included a few of these facts in his article as well.

TENNESSEE OFFICIAL ATHLETIC SITE - Athletics News

UT Athletics is one of only a handful of departments in the country that receives no funds from state subsidies or taxes.

The athletics department is committed to giving back to the University and the community through a variety of ways. Last year, the athletics program contributed more than $26.9 million to the university in some fashion.

In 2007-08 UTAD contributed over $4.5 million in direct cash support to university programs. By comparison:

* Alabama, UNC-Chapel Hill, and Virginia's athletic department made no contributions.
* Georgia's athletic association donated approximately $75,000 in scholarship gifts.
* Auburn's athletic department provided $200,000 for scholarships.
 
Last edited:
#12
#12
Nothing new here. Just another employee of the propaganda machine trying to make hay with a handful of facts and a truckload of innuendo...

:neener2:
 
#14
#14
Maybe I'm just not seeing it... But I didn't see that piece as being that bad. Low pretty much stated the obvious, that Smith stepped on toes and Orgeron did not like that. And Orgeron has the right to help make decisions for the good of the program, hell it's in his job title.

I personally like it that he was terminated... That's better than what the previous staff did by letting people who weren't up to par or doing things a certain way hang around longer than they should have been allowed.

As far as Chris Low, in my opinion he has been fair to the University of Tennessee over the years. Do I always agree with what he writes? No, but he has the keyboard and a job to do.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#15
#15
Maybe I'm just not seeing it... But I didn't see that piece as being that bad. Low pretty much stated the obvious, that Smith stepped on toes and Orgeron did not like that. And Orgeron has the right to help make decisions for the good of the program, hell it's in his job title.

I personally like it that he was terminated... That's better than what the previous staff did by letting people who weren't up to par or doing things a certain way hang around longer than they should have been allowed.

As far as Chris Low, in my opinion he has been fair to the University of Tennessee over the years. Do I always agree with what he writes? No, but he has the keyboard and a job to do.
Posted via VolNation Mobile



I didn't read it as outright critical. But there was definitely an element of "What the heck is going on over there with this new coaching staff?"
 
#16
#16
I'd be more annoyed by this if it were actually UTK paying for this instead of just the athletic department. It's not like this is $400,000 that would otherwise be available for academics or anything.

The money paid to get rid of a festering problem is well worth it. Even if it translates into 1 or 2 more wins, the payoff in revenues from ticket sales, bowl money and TV revenue will more than offset the $400K. Besides, if Smith gets another gig, UT pays only the difference in his new salary and the UT salary.

The coaching staff is responsible for looking at the big picture and not a narrow green eye shade view of things.
 
#17
#17
I didn't read it as outright critical. But there was definitely an element of "What the heck is going on over there with this new coaching staff?"

what the heck is going on is it seems that this staff takes the mentality either get on the ship or get off... That's how I took it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#18
#18
Maybe I'm just not seeing it... But I didn't see that piece as being that bad. Low pretty much stated the obvious, that Smith stepped on toes and Orgeron did not like that. And Orgeron has the right to help make decisions for the good of the program, hell it's in his job title.

I personally like it that he was terminated... That's better than what the previous staff did by letting people who weren't up to par or doing things a certain way hang around longer than they should have been allowed.

As far as Chris Low, in my opinion he has been fair to the University of Tennessee over the years. Do I always agree with what he writes? No, but he has the keyboard and a job to do.
Posted via VolNation Mobile


I agree, but others will whine if they feel that UT is portrayed in anything other than a blazing orange glow.
 
#19
#19
what the heck is going on is it seems that this staff takes the mentality either get on the ship or get off... That's how I took it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile


That's how you took it, yes. I just think talking about it in terms of paying two guys, one of whom isn't there, and there's some bad blood there ....

Not saying he's right at all. Just that seemed to me to be the tone of it.
 
#20
#20
I didn't read it as outright critical. But there was definitely an element of "What the heck is going on over there with this new coaching staff?"

Yea I mean it's not like they got a top 10 recruiting class or the #1 player.

Holy Hell!!! They didn't mesh with the strength coach so they are replacing him with a UT alum and a guy they have already worked with- what the hell are they thinking???
 
#21
#21
Should the big o have a say in what goes on in the s&c program? absolutely. Do we have the money to buy smith out? absolutely. smith thought it was his way or the highway and he was right.
 
#22
#22
That's how you took it, yes. I just think talking about it in terms of paying two guys, one of whom isn't there, and there's some bad blood there ....

Not saying he's right at all. Just that seemed to me to be the tone of it.

Hold up! A guy gets fired and he has bad blood towards his former employer.

It is pure insanity at UT right now.
 
#23
#23
Good thing Tennessee has plenty of money to dole out in this lousy economic climate.
The Vols have reached an agreement with strength coach Mark Smith and sent him packing after just six months on the job. They will pay him what he's owed in full for the next two years provided he doesn't land another job. If he does get another job, Tennessee would have to make up the difference.
In the meantime, the Vols have hired away North Texas' Aaron Ausmus (who by the way has an excellent reputation in strength and conditioning circles) and will also be paying him.
Tennessee athletic director Mike Hamilton justifies the move by saying Smith's contract will be mitigated. He was due to make $190,000 this year and $200,000 next year. Hamilton also points out that Ausmus will make "considerably less" than what Smith was being paid.
Tennessee officials have said little publicly about what led to Smith's departure. He was one of Lane Kiffin's first hires and received a $50,000 raise to come to Tennessee from South Carolina.
But several individuals close to the program said recruiting coordinator and defensive line coach Ed Orgeron was never fully on board with Smith, and that friction ultimately came to a head. There were other factors, too, but the Orgeron factor was the defining issue in Kiffin parting ways with Smith.
It's a reminder of how much juice Orgeron has with regard to pretty much every decision that's made within the Tennessee program right now.
There's a connection with Ausmus, too. He was Orgeron's strength coach at Ole Miss, and Ausmus also worked with Kiffin and Orgeron at Southern California. Ausmus was a track and field All-American at Tennessee.
Smith said Thursday that he preferred to move on and didn't want to get into a back-and-forth debate on what led to his departure.
"What's done is done," Smith said. "I think everybody kind of knows what's going on there. I just want to let it lie and move on. I don't think anything else needs to be said."

The lightning speed at which the new coach had to move to assemble a great staff and recruits was bound to have a few mistakes associated with it. I am very pleased to see him admit the mistake and take action to correct it. Additionally, I am glad he has the budget to pay for the correction in the short term for larger payoffs in the future.
 
#24
#24
That's how you took it, yes. I just think talking about it in terms of paying two guys, one of whom isn't there, and there's some bad blood there ....

Not saying he's right at all. Just that seemed to me to be the tone of it.

I'm not denying there's bad blood. I just don't have a problem buying a guy out that has been a problem with multiple coaches. The money is there... Spend a few dollars for the greater good of the program.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#25
#25
Sounds like Smith was very good at what he does. He stepped on the wrong toes (right or wrong on his end). It also seems that what ever happened could not be fixed for the long term. According to some Ausmus is as capable, and we chose the guy that may keep the boat from rocking as much. Its not like Smith is getting screwed here.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top