Charge Call on Fulky....

#6
#6
VolGee4 said:
It was technically called on Vescovi. They kept saying Fulky, but I believe it was changed.

With freedom of movement rules, it was still a bad call. The defender didn’t give Vescovi room around Fulky, and Fulky got run over.
Click to expand...

On the replay it looked to me like the Auburn defender was getting bullied a bit by Vescovi, but nothing worthy of a whistle the way the game was being played on both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankykong, CDB, supersmo18 and 1 other person
#12
#12
K-town Vol Fan said:
They said after halftime they took it away. They said he went to halftime with 3 fouls and came back the 2nd half and had only 1. Not sure what happened but thats what the announcers said.
Click to expand...
The announcers made a mistake. The PA said foul on Vescovi. The only place Fulk had a foul was in ESPN’s fantasy land. They invented the call, then took the imaginary call away. It didn’t happen at the scorer’s table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankykong, ArdentVol, chuckiepoo and 1 other person
#13
#13
Stoerner Fumbles said:
The announcers made a mistake. The PA said foul on Vescovi. The only place Fulk had a foul was in ESPN’s fantasy land. They invented the call, then took the imaginary call away. It didn’t happen at the scorer’s table.
Click to expand...

Jimmy Dykes is good if you are just listening to him and know nothing about the teams and Basketball for that matter. He seems to make a lot of stuff up on the fly to fit his narrative but he does it with much aplomb.o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo, ArdentVol and Stoerner Fumbles
#14
#14
The SEC should lead the way to moving charging and blocking calls to turnovers not personal fouls, given the wholesale incompetence, inconsistency and embarrassing calls made by referees allowed into our conference games. The conference and its member institutions should expect more from the trios put on the floor than the nonsense put out there now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankykong, EasternVol, TrumpedUpVol and 3 others
#15
#15
sechamp2012 said:
Jimmy Dykes is good if you are just listening to him and know nothing about the teams and Basketball for that matter. He seems to make a lot of stuff up on the fly to fit his narrative but he does it with much aplomb.o_O
Click to expand...
During the Grant/Admiral era he was always over-prepared. He knew every narrative, stat, and detail. He also knew good info about matchup history etc, and made interesting predictions. Now, he’s lazy, and just bulltits a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArdentVol
#16
#16
K-town Vol Fan said:
They said after halftime they took it away. They said he went to halftime with 3 fouls and came back the 2nd half and had only 1. Not sure what happened but thats what the announcers said.
Click to expand...
Was there last night and rewatched it today. They either never understood or they lied to make themselves look better about the whole taking the foul away thing? When I watched the replay today you could clearly see the ref hold up a 2 and 5 with his fingers calling the foul on Vescovi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iVolSoHard, Lankykong, chuckiepoo and 2 others
#17
#17
TartanTurff said:
The SEC should lead the way to moving charging and blocking calls to turnovers not personal fouls, given the wholesale incompetence, inconsistency and embarrassing calls made by referees allowed into our conference games. The conference and its member institutions should expect more from the trios put on the floor than the nonsense put out there now.
Click to expand...
I like that idea. At least that way you aren’t sitting our PG for a lot of the second half at Arkansas because of two BS charges called in 30 seconds.
 
#18
#18
Stoerner Fumbles said:
It turned out to be bad work by the announcers, not the refs. They were talking about Fulkerson while the PA announced, “foul on Vescovi”. The foul on Fulkerson wasn’t called. It’s not in the box score. We won. Let’s find something new to worry about.
Click to expand...

Ok.
Let's talk about the potential for poor quality, unaccountable refs at the upcoming UGA game or Arky "charge fest" game
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo and Dr H Lecter
#19
#19
VolGee4 said:
It was technically called on Vescovi. They kept saying Fulky, but I believe it was changed.

With freedom of movement rules, it was still a bad call. The defender didn’t give Vescovi room around Fulky, and Fulky got run over.
Click to expand...

It was changed at half is what I heard. But replay it and it was a player control charge foul that was signaled and that can only be Fulky. If it was a block on Santi they would have been shooting. No way it could be ruled an illegal screen since Fulky had already used up his dribble and could not advance the ball. They knew if they let the worst charge call in history stand it would be the lead on Sports Center so Pat and the boys did the deed. There is ZERO justification for a call on UT on that play. I have gone over all the replays a bunch as I have stated in another thread and cannot begin to think of their cover story. You had to have an agenda to get that call out of your whistle.
 
#20
#20
GUNTERSVOL said:
It was changed at half is what I heard. But replay it and it was a player control charge foul that was signaled and that can only be Fulky. If it was a block on Santi they would have been shooting. No way it could be ruled an illegal screen since Fulky had already used up his dribble and could not advance the ball. They knew if they let the worst charge call in history stand it would be the lead on Sports Center so Pat and the boys did the deed. There is ZERO justification for a call on UT on that play. I have gone over all the replays a bunch as I have stated in another thread and cannot begin to think of their cover story. You had to have an agenda to get that call out of your whistle.
Click to expand...
It was on Santi. Watch the replay. They ref signals his number clearly, and then they announced it on the PA. Fulkerson was never charged a foul.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankykong
#22
#22
Stoerner Fumbles said:
During the Grant/Admiral era he was always over-prepared. He knew every narrative, stat, and detail. He also knew good info about matchup history etc, and made interesting predictions. Now, he’s lazy, and just bulltits a lot.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you are right, in the past, I thought he was really well prepared and I liked him. You may be right he may have got used to the gig and feels he can coast on the prep and he probably can if he never gets any backlash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankykong, chuckiepoo and Stoerner Fumbles
#23
#23
Stoerner Fumbles said:
It was on Santi. Watch the replay. They ref signals his number clearly, and then they announced it on the PA. Fulkerson was never charged a foul.
Click to expand...

Well why did he signal a player control charging foul? And why did the announcers say that not one but two fouls were taken off Fulky during the halftime review? That charge call is unmistakable. If it was on Santi it is just as bad since the contact occured at Fulky's feet which was JUST across the three point line and the defender was still moving with one foot in front and one foot inside the line and could not possibly have been ruled as having established a defensive position. He unsuccessfully tried to cut off the path Santi had to take the ball from Fulky on his outside hip. A block is the only possible call on Santi and it was not signaled that way the 20 times I have replayed it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolArmy74
#25
#25
Stoerner Fumbles said:
During the Grant/Admiral era he was always over-prepared. He knew every narrative, stat, and detail. He also knew good info about matchup history etc, and made interesting predictions. Now, he’s lazy, and just bulltits a lot.
Click to expand...
there was a time he was the best talkng head on SEC hoops. This year, I cringe as soon as I hear him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sechamp2012, chuckiepoo and Stoerner Fumbles
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top