Ohio Vol
Inquisitor of Offense
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,057
- Likes
- 128
In case my user name isn't a giveaway, I live in Big Ten country. It's hilarious to hear a large group of mouth-breathers talk about how great the Big Ten is. Obviously, we all know this to be the height of stupidity.
The SEC is recognized, rightly so, as the best conference top-to-bottom with the SEC East being the toughest division/half-division in the country. Heck, it's a huge source of pride.
In order to win the East, it requires getting the best of Georgia and Florida, plus whoever the West throws out there. We all talk about how brutally tough the SEC is, in large part based on having to face (bare minimum) three tough teams every single year and normally five or six.
Is a BCS bowl every year unreasonable? Think about it. The only teams that have made a habit of getting in those games since the BCS began are as follows:
Florida State -- had to whip a pathetic conference with, at most, one B-level team. Didn't have a conference championship game until two years ago
Oklahoma -- Need only to beat Texas; their rise coincides nicely with Nebraska's precipitous decline
Ohio State -- Michigan, sometimes Penn State; no conference championship game. Their '02 team dodged a top-5 Iowa team
USC -- Laughably bad conference; no conference championship game
Miami -- Has declined dramatically since actually picking up a tough conference schedule. Before that, bad conference with no championship game
The common theme here is a fairly easy path to take, and with Oklahoma being the exception, no conference title game. And honestly, the Big 12 North was atrocious during Oklahoma's short run and really doesn't even warrant being called "good".
Since 1998, the following teams have won SEC championships:
Tennessee -- 1998
Alabama -- 1999
Florida -- 2000, 2006
LSU -- 2001, 2003
Georgia -- 2002, 2005
Auburn -- 2004
If we were talking about Tennessee's inability to win, say, the Sun Belt Conference or something else where a top-level program has no business struggling, then I'd buy into it a bit more. If Florida State hadn't won the ACC all those years that they did and were having trouble with Georgia Tech and Clemson and NC State every year, then criticism would be warranted. But we're talking about a division where four of six teams have a legitimate shot to win it, and any one of those teams could be competitive with the best in the country.
Am I content that UT hasn't won a conference title since '98? Of course not. Am I content that there have been only two appearances in the SEC title game since that time? No way. But am I also in possession of enough perspective to recognize how tough this division and this conference is, and that its very nature prevents any team from having long runs of success? I think so.
The way I see it is, we can't have it both ways. We can't constantly talk up how tough the division and the conference is by referring to how many top-level teams there are, then go ballistic when there's losses in conference.
The SEC is recognized, rightly so, as the best conference top-to-bottom with the SEC East being the toughest division/half-division in the country. Heck, it's a huge source of pride.
In order to win the East, it requires getting the best of Georgia and Florida, plus whoever the West throws out there. We all talk about how brutally tough the SEC is, in large part based on having to face (bare minimum) three tough teams every single year and normally five or six.
Is a BCS bowl every year unreasonable? Think about it. The only teams that have made a habit of getting in those games since the BCS began are as follows:
Florida State -- had to whip a pathetic conference with, at most, one B-level team. Didn't have a conference championship game until two years ago
Oklahoma -- Need only to beat Texas; their rise coincides nicely with Nebraska's precipitous decline
Ohio State -- Michigan, sometimes Penn State; no conference championship game. Their '02 team dodged a top-5 Iowa team
USC -- Laughably bad conference; no conference championship game
Miami -- Has declined dramatically since actually picking up a tough conference schedule. Before that, bad conference with no championship game
The common theme here is a fairly easy path to take, and with Oklahoma being the exception, no conference title game. And honestly, the Big 12 North was atrocious during Oklahoma's short run and really doesn't even warrant being called "good".
Since 1998, the following teams have won SEC championships:
Tennessee -- 1998
Alabama -- 1999
Florida -- 2000, 2006
LSU -- 2001, 2003
Georgia -- 2002, 2005
Auburn -- 2004
If we were talking about Tennessee's inability to win, say, the Sun Belt Conference or something else where a top-level program has no business struggling, then I'd buy into it a bit more. If Florida State hadn't won the ACC all those years that they did and were having trouble with Georgia Tech and Clemson and NC State every year, then criticism would be warranted. But we're talking about a division where four of six teams have a legitimate shot to win it, and any one of those teams could be competitive with the best in the country.
Am I content that UT hasn't won a conference title since '98? Of course not. Am I content that there have been only two appearances in the SEC title game since that time? No way. But am I also in possession of enough perspective to recognize how tough this division and this conference is, and that its very nature prevents any team from having long runs of success? I think so.
The way I see it is, we can't have it both ways. We can't constantly talk up how tough the division and the conference is by referring to how many top-level teams there are, then go ballistic when there's losses in conference.