1982Alum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,984
- Likes
- 1,152
Trying to justify Dooley as being comparable to Petrino right now is asinine. It's like trying to compare the Pittsburg Steelers against a HS football team.
Learn to read.
Petrino was 13-12 his first two seasons at Arkansas and has gone 21-5 since
it's something worth keeping in mind for those of us looking for some hope that Dooley might still be successful here
Sorry to go OT from the political debate, but anybody else realize that Petrino was 13-12 in his first two seasons at Arkansas and has gone 21-5 since?
I realize it's not an apples to apples comparison because he was so successful at Louisville, but it's something worth keeping in mind for those of us looking for some hope that Dooley might still be successful here.
Learn to make points that make sense. You compared Dooley to Petrino's first two years at Arky, correct?
They aren't comparable, even a little bit. It is obvious who the better of the two is. It is also obvious why Petrino had a longer leash at Arky than Dooley has here.
im assuming that none of this Petrino monkey business will involve any NCAA violations?.
Stop being a jackass.
Learn to make points that make sense. You compared Dooley to Petrino's first two years at Arky, correct?
They aren't comparable, even a little bit. It is obvious who the better of the two is. It is also obvious why Petrino had a longer leash at Arky than Dooley has here.
You've yet to respond with anything but attacks. Kudos to you.
I was stating that you can't compare them. Petrino was on a longer leash at Arkansas due to his past success at his previous stops. Dooley doesn't have the luxury of time like Petrino had.
