37L1
Good Dog!
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 11,808
- Likes
- 17,754
There has to be a third choice. Neither of those two apply.Absolutely not. It's a valid question.
I've tried to be patient with you in the past, explain things and even put up a pretty reasonable summation of the 2A in the other thread this morning you could have discussed rationally. I thought you were trolling some of the time, but now, I'm not so sure.
So, it's a simple question. Do you have a learning impediment and cannot comprehend things as they are laid out for you? Or are you just being daffy and can't grasp what others are posting because you don't want to?
There has to be a third choice. Neither of those two apply.
I was actually feeling the same way about most of you guys.
If I hear "there is already a law that makes it illegal, criminals break the, so what will another law accomplish" I think I will have an aneurysm.
That point has been made a million times.
It has absolutely no relevance to what I am saying needs to done.
If I hear "there is already a law that makes it illegal, criminals break the law, so what will another law accomplish" I think I will have an aneurysm.
Just be honest, the only way liberals will come together with conservatives is if the conservatives completely capitulate to their demands.
