Before the tournaments vs after:

#1
D

Dougie_D

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
3,700
Likes
1,400
#1
Weren’t we still considered as number 1 seed in the west over NC before the tournaments?
If the commitee wants to factor in the tournament play then they gotta factor in that we BEAT :
SEC champ
ACC champ
B10 champ
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: aWhiteLoftonChism
#3
#3
CornbreadVol said:
It was close but we had the edge heading into it.
Click to expand...
The reason I ask because if they use tournament play as part of their selection, they would have to factor that TN beat 3 champ teams
And if they want to disregard that.. they gotta stick with regular season play and give TN that 1st
 
#5
#5
It would have been nice to get the #1 seed for historical significance, but I believe a #2 seed playing the first two rounds in Charlotte will be a plus. More UT fans can make it and the first two rounds are definitely winnable. I was just down in Charlotte for a Men's conference and the area is very nice.
Have a blessed day.
 
#6
#6
Dougie_D said:
Weren’t we still considered as number 1 seed in the west over NC before the tournaments?
If the commitee wants to factor in the tournament play then they gotta factor in that we BEAT :
SEC champ
ACC champ
B10 champ
Click to expand...
Simple, they don't consider the tournaments. If they did Auburn would have got a higher seeding. Iowa State would have been a 1 seed. UK would not have been a 3 seed and UT would not have been the top 2 seed.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top