Barnhart: Vols on right track says Dooley

What are you talking about?

730_20110111005644771_660_320.JPG

imgres
 
What are you talking about?

Edit: nevermind, I get it. Fact is they let that game go after a huge lead.

They did. But also, Cam Newton.

As for the Carolina game, you could see it coming a mile away. Last of three straight big games, including a big win over Florida (huge game at the time), South Carolina coming off a bye with Gameday in town and a matchup advantage (Lattimore vs a rebuilding Bama run D)
 
They did. But also, Cam Newton.

As for the Carolina game, you could see it coming a mile away. Last of three straight big games, including a big win over Florida (huge game at the time), South Carolina coming off a bye with Gameday in town and a matchup advantage (Lattimore vs a rebuilding Bama run D)

I get all that, but the fact is tvols is claiming we should go 10-2 because only one team is vastly superior, yet bama lost to 2 teams with less talent and one that was comparable. Alabama was more talented at every position except qb against auburn, dl is debatable.
 
They are a reason for why UT has been bad. They aren't a great reason for why UT has been historically bad and they don't justify the regression of the running game, offensive line play, etc.

Well, when you combine it with being in a historically difficult conference, it closes that gap.

But I agree with most of what you say.
 
I get all that, but the fact is tvols is claiming we should go 10-2 because only one team is vastly superior, yet bama lost to 2 teams with less talent and one that was comparable. Alabama was more talented at every position except qb against auburn, dl is debatable.

Yeah, but when you win national championships, you gain goodwill. When you've never had an upset victory, you'd best minimize your upset losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yeah, but when you win national championships, you gain goodwill. When you've never had an upset victory, you'd best minimize your upset losses.
Exactly. I'm not saying Dooley should be fired at 9-3. I am saying it's not really that big an achievement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yeah, but including Penn State is like including Mississippi State. Except Mississippi State was half-decent.
Looking at that schedule, what kind of record do you think the Tennessee team would have? I see 3 games which are almost sure losses, and 3 others which seem to be questionable at best. With opponents having by weeks like Alabama's opponents had that year, I don't see much better than 7-5.
 
Looking at that schedule, what kind of record do you think the Tennessee team would have? I see 3 games which are almost sure losses, and 3 others which seem to be questionable at best.

The 2010 Alabama schedule? Auburn, Arkansas, and LSU are sure losses. Carolina is a close call. We played them pretty well with our crappy 2010 team, but they had skills and a bye. Mississippi State should be a win but wouldn't be easy. Florida and Penn State are easy wins for any competent team.

I'd say expected record of 8-4 with 9-3 more likely than 7-5. Assuming we are competent.
 
I have too. And something is definitely different.

A bad coach that has never won anything coaching Tennessee is what's different.

It's hilarious to watch people twist and turn and try to reason out why Tennessee hasn't been a good team for awhile.

Fulmer got lazy, Lane left too soon and Dooley's not very good. He was a rush hire by an incompetent AD. He could very well ride Bray's arm to a good season. I'll be cheering for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Fulmer got lazy, Lane left too soon and Dooley's not very good. He was a rush hire by an incompetent AD. He could very well ride Bray's arm to a good season. I'll be cheering for it.

This pretty much sums it up. Although Dooley is a smart guy who's been around some great coaches. He obviously wasn't ready for the UT job, but I still hold out a modicum of hope that the last two years have provided him with enough on-the-job learning to make him good. Or at least significantly better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
A bad coach that has never won anything coaching Tennessee is what's different.

It's hilarious to watch people twist and turn and try to reason out why Tennessee hasn't been a good team for awhile.

Fulmer got lazy, Lane left too soon and Dooley's not very good. He was a rush hire by an incompetent AD. He could very well ride Bray's arm to a good season. I'll be cheering for it.
I'm hoping for 10-2 or 7-5 and Gruden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This pretty much sums it up. Although Dooley is a smart guy who's been around some great coaches. He obviously wasn't ready for the UT job, but I still hold out a modicum of hope that the last two years have provided him with enough on-the-job learning to make him good. Or at least significantly better.
I get the feeling that he is intelligent, but I don't think he has nearly what it takes to win in the SEC.
 
Exactly. The problem with that is if Bray, Rogers, and Hunter leave and he follows it up with 7-5, does Tennessee have the stones to fire Dooley?

We'd better. If you're in your 4th year and can't win without the QB Lane left you, that's a problem. Really like to think it doesn't come to that, but chances are not small.
 
I get the feeling that he is intelligent, but I don't think he has nearly what it takes to win in the SEC.

I'm not convinced either, but I hope he convinces both of us. I do think he's never going to shut down like the end of last year again. That's a mistake you don't make twice.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top