BeecherVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 39,116
- Likes
- 14,439
Thanks.As reported publicly, including on VN, that is correct.
The relevant publicly stated sequence of events:
1. Barnes is offered the UCLA job
2. Close to a done deal and will be announced soon
3. Contract is held up due to stalled negotiations with the buyout. UCLA doesn't want to pay it as Barnes wants them to.
4. UT ups the ante with a new offer.
5. Barnes accepts and stays with UT.
Now for those who have emotions too fragile to allow them to see the obvious here I'll connect the dots. If number 3 doesn't happen numbers 4 and 5 can't happen. Maybe a simpler translation: if UCLA agrees to pay the buyout, then the contract is signed and we never up the ante which kept him here. We already knew that. Those were the facts as already reported. There was nothing new or sinister in anything CRB said.
If Barnes comments are legit in regards to the buyout, it looks more like he either just didnt like the entire deal financially from UCLA or he took offense to the idea they balked at paying his buyout. .
UT stepping up almost sounds more like insurance and not part of the reason he stayed.