This is what we don't know. Did Miller know Miles had left the gun? I mean, I think there's a decent chance of that. That comes back around to the question of what Miller thought was happening when he arrived at ths scene.
As to LG's question, Miles' defense attorney and Miller's attorney both agree that the 1:38 a.m. text was the first point at which had requested his gun. Nothing that was said under oath by the detectives suggested otherwise. I guess one has to make of that what one will.
As to LG's question, Miles' defense attorney and Miller's attorney both agree that the 1:38 a.m. text was the first point at which had requested his gun. Nothing that was said under oath by the detectives suggested otherwise. I guess one has to make of that what one will.
That those attorneys agree is pointless. It serves the interest of both to say that's all there is.
And that may be exactly what they say: "According to the records we have been provided by investigators, the first and only contact was at 1:38."
Which begs the question, were there others which were not obtained?
Now, I'm not one to buy into the notion that the police would intentionally endanger the integrity of the prosecution to help one person's NBA prospects. But they are officials with limited resources. And fact is the public might not ever be provided the full cell phone records of each going back 24 hours, both calls and texts, IMs, etc. Much less those of close by third persons which might also shed light on communications.
I do not imply relevant messages exist. I'm saying we don't know. And I'm still stuck on hey, bring me my gun, and it's 130 am and coincidentally minutes later there's a gun fight. Possible he knew absolutely nothing? Sure. I'm having a hard time getting to likely.