
Sources: Big Ten, SEC eye schedule partnership
SEC and Big Ten athletic directors will meet next week to discuss a possible partnership in football scheduling and preferences for automatic bids, sources told ESPN.
Between those two conferences, I think there is about 2 billion in TV revenue to share. If this scheduling partnership is a trial run for a full partnership for the future, the final nail in the coffin for the ACC and other conferences will be placed.
The NFL is the ratings king, CFB is not even close.We need to get to ONE conference or league or whatever we want to call it. But two conferences would work as long as they cooperated.
Have a commissioner or other governing body and some real rules.
Break into divisions looking more like the old college conferences based on geography.
Keep the playoff but improve it.
Think NFL…but much larger. The money would be huge.
If the BIG has an issue with the number of in conference games the SEC plays, then they don't really want to enter an agreement. The BIG is trying to devalue the strength of the SEC if they want SEC teams to play an extra SEC game.The future scheduling partnership could hinge on whether the SEC eventually decides to go to nine conference games -- a topic one SEC source said hasn't been a focus of conversations lately. Some Big Ten athletic directors could push back on any agreement if the SEC doesn't move to nine games, because the Big Ten already plays nine league opponents.
The conference is too big for an 8 game schedule unless you don't mind seeing some annual rivalries go away.If the BIG has an issue with the number of in conference games the SEC plays, then they don't really want to enter an agreement. The BIG is trying to devalue the strength of the SEC if they want SEC teams to play an extra SEC game.
I think I’m pretty safe in saying that on a weekly basis, more people watch college football than the NFL. What do you mean specifically when you say “the NFL is the ratings king?”The NFL is the ratings king, CFB is not even close.
But I don't want CFB to be anything like the NFL. I am afraid that any continued consolidation of power is only going to hurt more than help. Keep disinfranchising fans of other schools and those fans will stop watching. I feel like CFB is at or near its peak, it's all downhill from here.
The powers that be can't help themselves, their greed is going to kill the golden goose.
SEC and B1G are going to throw their weight around and bully everyone else. I'm glad we're at the big boy table but not sure what they're trying to do is best for CFB in general.
I think I’m pretty safe in saying that on a weekly basis, more people watch college football than the NFL. What do you mean specifically when you say “the NFL is the ratings king?”
Eh idk. Are those four teams not better than most of what the other conferences produce? I mean you generally have one ACC team that’s any count and one big 12 team. Still leaves two slots for them to piss away on teams like Notre Dame that have zero chance in the playoffs.4 guaranteed entries for Little 10? They don’t have that many good teams compared to SEC….this is making a deal with the devil.
FYI, You sound exactly like a Longhorn fan. This is one the EXACT tactics used by the Longhorns to gain power within their conference.If everyone could agree that the ACC and Big 12 are currently weak, we wouldn’t need to take further steps to prove it. If the Big 10 and SEC do not go this route, then we’re not going to get the 12 best teams into the playoffs.
At least Clemson is starting to beat up on their conference opponents. That’s the kind of thing I need to see before they get ranked ahead of Missouri or Oklahoma. (As if I personally have a say in the matter).
They will convince enough of the top programs that they are worth more money than the rest and expect an unequal revenue share in return.I wouldn’t know about them. Finebaum and SEC Network treated Nick Saban’s Bama the same way though, so you’re probably right.
My point is. If they stay at 12, there is no way that the Little 10 should get 4. I would say most years the 5 place SEC team is better than the 3 or 4 Little 10. If they stay at 12, the SEC will be limited to 4 every year.Eh idk. Are those four teams not better than most of what the other conferences produce? I mean you generally have one ACC team that’s any count and one big 12 team. Still leaves two slots for them to piss away on teams like Notre Dame that have zero chance in the playoffs.
I've no argument that the B1G isn't as strong on it field as the SEC. That's obvious.My point is. If they stay at 12, there is no way that the Little 10 should get 4. I would say most years the 5 place SEC team is better than the 3 or 4 Little 10. If they stay at 12, the SEC will be limited to 4 every year.
if they go to 16 and they each are guaranteed 4 but not limited based on rankings the SEC could get 5 or 6, then I would be game To the change.
First I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said however I would say that eventually as more and more revenue goes to the big ten and SEC that more and more talent is going to concentrate there. The problem right now with the playoffs is there is too many political ways for a team like Notre Dame to take a spot even though they don’t deserve it.My point is. If they stay at 12, there is no way that the Little 10 should get 4. I would say most years the 5 place SEC team is better than the 3 or 4 Little 10. If they stay at 12, the SEC will be limited to 4 every year.
if they go to 16 and they each are guaranteed 4 but not limited based on rankings the SEC could get 5 or 6, then I would be game To the change.