B10 Has a Big Week -- Again

#1

VFL-82-JP

Bleedin' Orange...
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
20,553
Likes
56,598
#1
Week Three was the Big Ten's week, much as Week One was.

The SEC has the slightest of statistical advantages in Week Three when you compare records against all OOC opponents, at 83% to 82% (5-1 versus 9-2). But the B10 greatly surpasses the SEC, and every other conference, in P5-vs-P5 results, with a dominating 5-0 result this weekend. The "5" includes compelling wins over the B12 (Ohio State beat Oklahoma 45-24), the PAC (Michigan over Colorado, 45-28, and Nebraska beat Oregon, 35-32), and Notre Dame (Mich State beat them, 36-28). Even Northwestern got into the act, pummelling fellow smart-school Duke of the ACC, 24-13. Yes, this was the B10's week.

Meanwhile the SEC, which started conference play in earnest, lost its lone P5-vs-P5 game when Vandy choked on Georgia Tech's wishbone, 38-7. The conference did well otherwise in OOC play, 5-0 not counting Vandy, but all against lighter competition.

The PAC was right up there with the top conferences in OOC results, at 8-2 (80%), but results were more decidedly mixed when you look specifically at P5-vs-P5: 2-2 (50%). That's still enough to outshine the ACC and B12, both of whom went 1-2 (33%) versus P5 opponents. The B12 was once again tail-end Charlie among Power 5 conferences, with a 4-3 (57%) win rate against all OOC competition this weekend.

Conf%20Standings%20Wk%203.png


Looking at the season to date, the B10 is making a compelling case for the title, King of the Power 5 Hill. At 30-8 (almost 80%) versus all OOC opponents to date, and a dominating 8-3 (73%) record against Power 5, it's hard to argue they're not the best conference in college football so far.

Can the SEC catch them? Maybe, but the window of opportunity closes a little more each week. We have already played ten of our P5-vs-P5 games of the regular season; only five more remain. It seems highly unlikely we will sweep those, since four of the five games come in the final week with the traditional SEC-vs-ACC in-state battles (FL-FSU, UGa-GaTech, USCe-Clemson, and KY-Louisville). Even if we were to win all five remaining P5 matches, the best we can do on the regular season is 10-5 (67%), a record the B10 is already surpassing and looks to have a good chance to maintain.

The B10 front-loaded their OOC schedule even more than the SEC. They only have four games left out-of-conference. Three of those will happen this coming weekend (Indiana-Wake Forest, Minnesota-Colorado State, and Purdue-Nevada), and then the final OOC game takes place in early October, with Michigan State vs BYU. Note: only two of those games are against P5+I2 teams: Indiana-Wake, and Mich St-BYU. And that's it; the rest of the year for them, all 14 teams, is conference play.

So here's the only way the SEC retains the title as best conference in college football (based on regular season results): sweep the ACC at the end of the year, end up 10-5 (67%) vs P5 opponents, while the B10 loses its last two P5-v-P5 games, ending the season 8-5 (62%). If the B10 wins either one of those games against Wake and BYU, we can't catch them.

How likely is all this? Not very. Kentucky looks to be in no position thus far to beat Louisville, nor USCe to beat Clemson. Florida winning over FSU is a crap shoot.

Bottom line from Week 3 is, don't be surprised to hear the National Media take up the hue and cry that the SEC's crown has been usurped by the B10. The on-field results are on their side, and will likely remain that way until we get to bowl season.

Here's hoping we can reverse those fortunes in December and January; the regular season is all but over for out-of-conference play, already.



p.s. Last season, I kept reporting on Power 5 out-of-conference standings through the entire year. At this point in 2016, that seems a bit superfluous (not to mention masochistic). So, for now, I'm planning on NOT reporting each of the coming weeks; will continue to track it, but will only post if there seems to be something significant and new. Go Vols!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3
#3
#13 Iowa lost to South Dakota St.

Yes, and that was ugly. It shows that Iowa was over-rated, I think. But it doesn't affect the B10's P5-vs-P5 record (since SD St is not a P5 team), and is only one loss in a pretty strong B10-vs-OOC record to date.

In short, the B10 "could afford it" and still not lose its strong position among the Power 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4
#4
Eventually the conferences are going balance power anyway, but when big 10 hires SEC champ coaches, and NFL coaches, and SEC hires MAC coaches it happens sooner than later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
way too early to proclaim anyone champion of anything right now...as you know anything can happen in college football...that's why it's so much fun to watch...thanks VFL...good post...:rock:

GO VOLS!
 
#6
#6
#13 Iowa lost to South Dakota St.

*North Dakota State, who has won 4 straight FCS titles and now beaten their last 6 FBS opponents. Not exactly anything to be really embarrassed about, other than the extremely conservative playcalling at the end by Iowa.
 
#8
#8
way too early to proclaim anyone champion of anything right now...as you know anything can happen in college football...that's why it's so much fun to watch...thanks VFL...good post...:rock:

GO VOLS!

Yep, Roller, you'd think that (way too early). But with the out-of-conference play generally so front-loaded in most team's schedules, these things have the potential to be decided early.

That hasn't been true in the past; most recent years I've been tracking this, that final weekend of SEC-vs-ACC play has been key to ranking the conferences.

But this year, the B10 started off so strong, and is so front-loaded with their OOC schedule (remember, they went to 9 conference games, and intentionally jammed all conference play into the latter three-fourths of the season), that it is already all but decided.

*shrug* It is what it is. There's still room for us to reclaim the title of Best Conference in the post-season. Winning the national title and winning more bowl games than anyone else are also compelling arguments.
 
#9
#9
Maybe things have / are shifting back more toward the B10. SEC is obviously strong, but honestly at some point we have to realize it's Bama, the pretty good teams, then the weak teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
I don't know about "vulnerable to an average Colorado team", after about 8:49 in the second quarter, Michigan pretty much took over the game and would run away with it from there.

That Colorado team is way better than people think. They gave some play makers. I think they caught Michigan off guard. But like you stated, Michigan took over the game. They are certainly a great team.
 
#15
#15
Yep, Roller, you'd think that (way too early). But with the out-of-conference play generally so front-loaded in most team's schedules, these things have the potential to be decided early.

That hasn't been true in the past; most recent years I've been tracking this, that final weekend of SEC-vs-ACC play has been key to ranking the conferences.

But this year, the B10 started off so strong, and is so front-loaded with their OOC schedule (remember, they went to 9 conference games, and intentionally jammed all conference play into the latter three-fourths of the season), that it is already all but decided.

*shrug* It is what it is. There's still room for us to reclaim the title of Best Conference in the post-season. Winning the national title and winning more bowl games than anyone else are also compelling arguments.

Since the issue of Best Conference became a big deal around the end of the Majors era for me, and we didn't have instant access to records over the net, I always waited til bowl season anyway, never paid much attention to regular season OOC play on a national level.

I suppose some feel that's not reasonable now with instant correlation ability. It is what it is for the regular season. But just as the NC is decided post season, I only care what happens in the bowls to decide best conference at the end of the year. I won't add regular season to the post season tally.
 
#16
#16
Since the issue of Best Conference became a big deal around the end of the Majors era for me, and we didn't have instant access to records over the net, I always waited til bowl season anyway, never paid much attention to regular season OOC play on a national level.

I suppose some feel that's not reasonable now with instant correlation ability. It is what it is for the regular season. But just as the NC is decided post season, I only care what happens in the bowls to decide best conference at the end of the year. I won't add regular season to the post season tally.

Yeah, there are two sides to the regular season / bowl season coin, Dog.

There are more OOC games (a lot more) in the regular season. Even if you limit it to just Power 5 versus Power 5, there are still significantly more in the regular season than in the bowls. For instance, the SEC has 15 P5-vs-P5 games in the 2016 regular season; we'll probably only have about 10 bowl games. It's even starker for other conferences, like a 20-to-8 kind of ratio for, say, the PAC or B12.

On the other hand, the bowl games tend to be better contests against more evenly matched teams, largely because the bowl committees demand compelling games that are likely to go to the 4th quarter.

So I keep track of both. Then I kind of smoosh them together, along with who won the NC, as an overall "who was the best conference for the year" metric.

Go Vols!
 
#17
#17
You have to look at who they played. The B10 isn't worth a damn other than Ohio State and Michigan. Sparty isn't good and beat a bad notre dame team, wisconsin got a win over an overrated LSU team, nebraska beat a bad Oregon team. It's much less impressive when you look at the individual games.
 
#18
#18
You have to look at who they played. The B10 isn't worth a damn other than Ohio State and Michigan. Sparty isn't good and beat a bad notre dame team, wisconsin got a win over an overrated LSU team, nebraska beat a bad Oregon team. It's much less impressive when you look at the individual games.

Especially if you put "bad" before the names of teams who, had they won, would frequently be contending for their conference championships (LSU, Oregon) or even more.

In other words, you only get to say "bad" because the B10 teams beat them.

That's some Monday morning QBing, there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#19
#19
You have to look at who they played. The B10 isn't worth a damn other than Ohio State and Michigan. Sparty isn't good and beat a bad notre dame team, wisconsin got a win over an overrated LSU team, nebraska beat a bad Oregon team. It's much less impressive when you look at the individual games.

LSU with Etling at QB is a much better team. Somewhere between Ole Miss and Alabama I'm guessing. Same for Ark and aTm.
 
#20
#20
Especially if you put "bad" before the names of teams who, had they won, would frequently be contending for their conference championships (LSU, Oregon) or even more.

In other words, you only get to say "bad" because the B10 teams beat them.

That's some Monday morning QBing, there.

Exactly, if you look at each game I say they have some pretty solid wins
 
Advertisement



Back
Top