Article: Straight Talk

#1
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
30,513
Likes
3
#1
A member of the media just comes right out and calls it...

TFP's Mark Wiedmer this morning.
The question for today is this: What is University of Tennessee athletic director Mike Hamilton waiting for regarding football coach Phillip Fulmer's future?

A sweep of Wyoming, Vanderbilt and Kentucky?

Nick Saban to say he's available?

Mad scientists announcing they've cloned General Neyland?

After Saturday night's 27-6 humbling at South Carolina, the hay's in the barn on this season. Fulmer is out of opportunities to prove he has improved the 2008 Vols. Even if he wins out, so what? The program has lost one game total to Kentucky and Vanderbilt combined over the past 23 years. Winning out against the Cowboys, Commodores and Cats proves nothing.

Beyond that, the fans are out of patience. They've now seen the Vols lose five of six SEC games by 79 points. They've seen the offense become as exciting as a touchback. Given the economy, they probably hope UT misses a bowl for the second time in four years, if only to cement Fulmer's fate and save a few holiday dollars in the bargain.

Mostly, Hamilton could soon be out of hot prospects to replace Fulmer if he doesn't act swiftly. Let him drag this out as Auburn (doubtful), Clemson, Washington, Penn State (possible), Florida State (possible) and others begin wooing the Next Best Thing and UT could wind up with Texas El-Paso coach Mike Price rather than Texas Tech coach Mike Leach.

Remember how North Carolina snapped up Butch Davis a couple of years ago by axing John Bunting before the dew dried on Halloween pumpkins? He who hesitates can be quickly lost in the coaching search carousel.

Don't get me wrong. This isn't about whether or not Hamilton should keep Fulmer for a 17th season as the Big Orange boss. That's Hamilton's call.

Personally, I'd give Fulmer one more year. The school seems to be on the verge of a Top Five recruiting class. Offensive coordinator Dave Clawson — if he stays — has usually seen a marked improvement in his offenses from year one to year two. And since Eric Berry's stuck in the college game for one more year, the defense almost assuredly won't decline.

Besides, in a tough economy, showing some fiscal restraint should be appreciated by all but the most rabid and unrealistic Volniacs.

And if next year proves even close to as unsatisfactory as this one, even Fulmer would have a hard time intelligently pleading his case to remain.

So what is Hamilton doing? One theory suggests that he will wait until after this weekend's Homecoming game against Wyoming to can his coach, hopeful that a somewhat sparse crowd of 70,000 or so would cement an argument that the program attempting to complete a $200-plus million renovation of Neyland Stadium and other facilities can ill-afford such apathy.

But there is another argument for axing Fulmer now that may be just as tough for Hamilton to ignore. The Vols must travel to Florida next September. The Gators have won the last two meetings against UT by a combined 63 points. If that trend holds, Hamilton could spend most of next fall battling the same firestorm he has the past two autumns regarding Fulmer's future.

Ultimately — if it truly is Hamilton's belief that it is time for the Vols to move in a new direction — there is nothing to be gained by forcing Fulmer and his team to sweat that decision. In fact, it's cruel. Fulmer may not deserve to keep running the program, but he certainly doesn't deserve to twist in the wind. He deserves to leave on his preferred terms.

So let him coach the remaining three regular-season games. Encourage the fans to salute him with a standing ovation prior to the home finale against Kentucky, which has never beaten Fulmer.

In fact, Hamilton should strongly suggest that Fulmer run solo through the “T” a final time, serenaded by 106,000 Volniacs belting out Rocky Top. Call it Phillip Fulmer Appreciation Day.

But whatever decision Hamilton makes — especially if that decision to fire Fulmer — he needs to move quickly, lest he finish second for the guy who is first on everyone's wish list.
 
#2
#2
Pretty good article. However, he lost me at "Personally, I'd give Fulmer one more year". How can you take any article seriously when that point of view is expressed. It's not like this guy has never been given a chance(s). Even a cat only gets nine shots at it. Enough is enough. Time for Fulmer to pack up his ego and head for the barn.
 
#3
#3
Pretty good article, I agree with mostly of what he said, except for the fact of keeping him 1 more year.
 
#4
#4
Thanks OWH. He's putting everyone's thoughts into print. Now it's time for action.
 
#5
#5
That is what some people don't get. It doesn't matter if we get a top 5 recruiting class or not. What will we do with them when they get here. Fulmer has always recruited well, except for a couple of times, but he just can't develop the players when they get here. I would rather have a new coach and a #20 recruiting class than Fulmer another year and a top 5 class.
 
#6
#6
The only reason we should not replace Fulmer - and I mean the ONLY - is if there is not a secured replacement ready to sign a contract. We don't need to fire a coach just for the sake of firing. If Hamilton is half the business man I think he is - he is pounding the pavement working to secure a replacement. If that happens, you will get the retirement announcement. If the pool dries up, we could unfortunately not have a replacement.
 
#7
#7
The only reason we should not replace Fulmer - and I mean the ONLY - is if there is not a secured replacement ready to sign a contract. We don't need to fire a coach just for the sake of firing. If Hamilton is half the business man I think he is - he is pounding the pavement working to secure a replacement. If that happens, you will get the retirement announcement. If the pool dries up, we could unfortunately not have a replacement.

100% agree...can't go to Plan B until there is a Plan B.
 
#9
#9
Perhaps the best Plan B would be for Fulmer to announce he's retiring after next year so we can work a whole year to find the right coach rather than scramble at the end of bowl season.

(this is based on current availability of candidates).
 
#10
#10
Perhaps the best Plan B would be for Fulmer to announce he's retiring after next year so we can work a whole year to find the right coach rather than scramble at the end of bowl season.

(this is based on current availability of candidates).

I tend to believe that we are are on the hook with Fulmer for another year for several reasons (the buyout and the transistion plan or lack there of being two big ones)

Not a popular opinion with the storm the Bastille crowd (and I wave a torch myself) but change for the sake of change won't work. We need a plan and someone to pick up the pieces. The AD should always have a plan but we can't expect to see evidence of that until the day comes.
 
Last edited:
#11
#11
I tend to believe that we are are on the hook with Fulmer for another year for several reasons (the buyout and the transistion plan or lack there of being two big ones)

Not a popular opinion with the storm the Bastille crowd (and I wave a torch myself) but change for the sake of change won't work. We need a plan and someone to pick up the pieces. The AD should always have a plan but we can't expect to see evidence of that until the day comes.
There is a plan, Hamilton has said as much. There is even a contingency fund in the department budget that will cover the bulk of the buyout.

These are smart people, they know how to do this.
 
#12
#12
Yeah its great that Hamilton says he has a plan and all this but sometimes I wonder. Is there really a plan to get rid of fulmer? why not make an announcement of some sort? Either he is staying or going. This season is over the only possibilty would be to go to the music city , liberty bowl or some such. Is the announcement really going to affect this? I seriously doubt it.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top