Army all America Vs. Under armour?

#1
peewee

peewee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
708
Likes
0
#1
I have been arguing for days that under armour does not have all the best players at every position..

In your opinion who has more talent on the rosters? out of the 2 games..
GO VOLS!! we need TOP RECRUITS NOW!!!!:loco:
 
#3
#3
I have been saying the samething.. I am arguing with a BAM though. lol
 
#4
#4
peewee said:
I have been arguing for days that under armour does not have all the best players at every position..

In your opinion who has more talent on the rosters? out of the 2 games..
GO VOLS!! we need TOP RECRUITS NOW!!!!:loco:
Click to expand...

So I guess that the top 2 recruits are in the UA game means they suck. Clowney, Kouandjio, Driskel, Frazier and others are in it. Personally though I like the army better
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#7
#7
I've noitced that UA gets the higher ranked guys but the Army will get a lot of very good players and the players who played in the Army seem to do better in the long run. IMO
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#9
#9
UA is better and these games have no bearing on what type of player they'll be.
 
#11
#11
HardKnoxVol said:
So I guess that the top 2 recruits are in the UA game means they suck. Clowney, Kouandjio, Driskel, Frazier and others are in it. Personally though I like the army better
Posted via VolNation Mobile[
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...
 
#12
#12
I like army better. He was just trying to tell me ALL the top players was at UA.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#13
#13
I was wondering the same thing as Volsfan15. Anyone that is supposed to announce that we are IN IT for or that analysts are thinking will be announcing UT?
 
#16
#16
Army game. For some reason, I don't pay much attention to the Under Armour game. I probably should... :lol:
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#17
#17
peewee said:
I have been arguing for days that under armour does not have all the best players at every position..

In your opinion who has more talent on the rosters? out of the 2 games..
GO VOLS!! we need TOP RECRUITS NOW!!!!:loco:
Click to expand...

The Under Armour is much better run and organized and the game is far better and far more competitive.

The Army game is a complete joke with the way politics are involved. Yes they probably have a little bit more talent on paper (because it has been around the longest), but there is no comparison which is the more competitive and enjoyable game to watch.

You dont see all these overated ND commits at the game like you do in the Army game, nor do you see all these kids of celebrity parents (like Chris Collinsworth's kid last year) who aren't very good like you see in the Army game.


The level of talent they are getting it improving dramatically as well with UA. Plus they focus more on bringing in the prospects from the South as well and we all know that is where the best talent comes from. It was nice seeing Justin Hunger, Da'Rick and Juwuan James all play together last year in the UA game.
 
Last edited:
#19
#19
PimpVol said:
Has the perception of the Army game changed any since back then?
Click to expand...
Both games are good. Most kids these days go to the first one to offer them. These two are clearly better top to bottom than the other games. If I had to pick the one with "better talent" it would probably be the Army game, because ESPN and their "recruiting analysts" suck and they use their rankings when inviting kids to the UA game. Both are good though and loaded with talent
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top