Another Teacher-Student Sex Scandal

#1,410
#1,410
CagleMtnVol said:
Not Guilty
Click to expand...
giphy.gif


 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF
#1,414
#1,414
Orangesmokey said:
www.yahoo.com

Alabama Coach Who Had Sex With Student Wants Charges Dropped, Her Reason Has People Furious

An Alabama high school girls’ basketball coach, who was married, was recently slapped with 32 criminal charges because of allegations that he engaged in sex acts with an 18-year-old boy.… The post Ala...
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

Update on this story... this lady has lost it for sure.
Click to expand...
Yeah she don't get her position extends beyond her classroom or team roster. The only thing saving her is if the boy was already 18 when she began. She may skirt by pedo charges, but her position as a teacher will not free her from the rest. Though in today's courts with the right judge (which won't be hard) they might win that argument. But, any meaningful life for her is done. She just be a skank fast food worker from now on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland and Orangesmokey
#1,415
#1,415
Orangesmokey said:
www.yahoo.com

Alabama Coach Who Had Sex With Student Wants Charges Dropped, Her Reason Has People Furious

An Alabama high school girls’ basketball coach, who was married, was recently slapped with 32 criminal charges because of allegations that he engaged in sex acts with an 18-year-old boy.… The post Ala...
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

Update on this story... this lady has lost it for sure.
Click to expand...
Just playing the devil's advocate here, does she have a point? Also, the article is a bit odd. In one part it indicates the teacher was a man, while the balance of the article seems clear it was a female teacher/coach.
 
#1,418
#1,418
GroverCleveland said:
Just playing the devil's advocate here, does she have a point? Also, the article is a bit odd. In one part it indicates the teacher was a man, while the balance of the article seems clear it was a female teacher/coach.
Click to expand...
It is an interesting argument, and the only reason she has that argument to make is because hte student was already 18.

However, to play devil's advocate to your devil's advocate, in the companies I've worked for if I had a relationship with an employee in a lesser position, especially in gen pop, it would have been deemed inappropriate. Well, except the one company. Everyone knew hte area mgr was popping one of hte sewing machine operators for years and turned a blind eye. Actually met my wife in same company, same building but I managed 3 satellite departments and she was on production floor. She also left for another job cause we knew we were gonna be together and didn't want to make that an issue. But I digress. Point being you don't have to be directly over someone for it to be inappropriate, in this case in her class or on her team, cause one wrong move and a pissed off underling and you gotta legal suit regardless.

Either way, will be curious to see how judge allows that argument. Because that will set a precedent and any previous teacher/student scandals accross the country where the student was of legal age will be back in court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#1,419
#1,419
Well, there's a difference between "having bad taste" and going to prison. She was indicted on 32 crimes. Dating somebody on your crew at work is really just slightly bad taste. Dating somebody that reports to you directly or indirectly is putting the company at risk, so they might stop you. That is just a self-interest issue for the company.

As far as her having a point, it depends on just how "not my student" he was. If he went to high school where she was part of the staff, then they won't drop the charges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF
#1,421
#1,421
GVF said:
It is an interesting argument, and the only reason she has that argument to make is because hte student was already 18.

However, to play devil's advocate to your devil's advocate, in the companies I've worked for if I had a relationship with an employee in a lesser position, especially in gen pop, it would have been deemed inappropriate. Well, except the one company. Everyone knew hte area mgr was popping one of hte sewing machine operators for years and turned a blind eye. Actually met my wife in same company, same building but I managed 3 satellite departments and she was on production floor. She also left for another job cause we knew we were gonna be together and didn't want to make that an issue. But I digress. Point being you don't have to be directly over someone for it to be inappropriate, in this case in her class or on her team, cause one wrong move and a pissed off underling and you gotta legal suit regardless.

Either way, will be curious to see how judge allows that argument. Because that will set a precedent and any previous teacher/student scandals accross the country where the student was of legal age will be back in court.
Click to expand...
Textile mills were notorious for fraternization, or at least the ones I knew anything about.
 
#1,422
#1,422
Firebirdparts said:
Well, there's a difference between "having bad taste" and going to prison. She was indicted on 32 crimes. Dating somebody on your crew at work is really just slightly bad taste. Dating somebody that reports to you directly or indirectly is putting the company at risk, so they might stop you. That is just a self-interest issue for the company.

As far as her having a point, it depends on just how "not my student" he was. If he went to high school where she was part of the staff, then they won't drop the charges.
Click to expand...
I dated the CFO of a company I worked on while I was just a lowly VP. But it probably helped she was one of the larger stockholders and a member of the family with essentially a controlling interest.
 
#1,423
#1,423
Firebirdparts said:
Well, there's a difference between "having bad taste" and going to prison. She was indicted on 32 crimes. Dating somebody on your crew at work is really just slightly bad taste. Dating somebody that reports to you directly or indirectly is putting the company at risk, so they might stop you. That is just a self-interest issue for the company.

As far as her having a point, it depends on just how "not my student" he was. If he went to high school where she was part of the staff, then they won't drop the charges.
Click to expand...
Not likely. But, they aren't arguing in court right now. they're arguing for the judge to throw it out. You are 100% correct, but if they have one of those flaky judges.....
Firebirdparts said:
Here's another one.


View attachment 834545
Click to expand...
If I'm seeing double nose rings...Guilty
 
  • Like
Reactions: Firebirdparts, walkenvol and GroverCleveland
#1,424
#1,424
GroverCleveland said:
Textile mills were notorious for fraternization, or at least the ones I knew anything about.
Click to expand...
The one I worked for 17 years was very notorious for fraternizing. There was a corral of women from floor employees to office ladies that got "invited" to those highr level manager retreats. I had never before, and wisely not since, fraternized except for the one that became my wife. And it was apparent from the second minute of saying "hi" to each other it was a done deal and not just messing around with an employee. So, she kept it above board and left the company for another job. Others....not so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top