Abundant Life Christian School shooting

#676
#676
LouderVol said:
but it does say we are all afforded equal protection of the law. and that the US nor any state shall "abridge or deny" our liberty.

I mean maybe yall are being semantic as hades but I read "shall not abridge and deny" as the same "shall not be infringed upon".
Click to expand...
Just to be clear here. “All” does include the dead democrat voters right?

I guess it just depends on how you read it
 
#677
#677
hog88 said:
So when it comes to voting as long as everyone is required to have and the mechanisms are available to obtain a valid ID we are all equally protected under the law. Nobody's right to vote is being denied.

Try again.
Click to expand...
same thing with buying a gun. everyone is required. just like with voting. the mechanisms are available to obtain a valid ID, just like voting. under your argument here nobodies rights to buy or own a gun is being denied. which is contradictory to the arguments I have seen you make regarding guns.
 
#678
#678
Jxn Vol said:
Just to be clear here. “All” does include the dead democrat voters right?

I guess it just depends on how you read it
Click to expand...
even in that situation they have the right, doesn't mean they are physically able to.
having the right doesn't mean you have to use it either.
 
#679
#679
LouderVol said:
same thing with buying a gun. everyone is required. just like with voting. the mechanisms are available to obtain a valid ID, just like voting. under your argument here nobodies rights to buy or own a gun is being denied. which is contradictory to the arguments I have seen you make regarding guns.
Click to expand...

Yep but there is nothing in the constitution barring the infringing on voting.

You keep flailing with poor logic.
 
#680
#680
hog88 said:
Yep but there is nothing in the constitution barring the infringing on voting.

You keep flailing with poor logic.
Click to expand...
except for the 14th amendment which requires equal application of the law.

and I don't see how you can argue for unequal application of the law.
 
#682
#682
LouderVol said:
except for the 14th amendment which requires equal application of the law.

and I don't see how you can argue for unequal application of the law.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure that's how EP works. I believe it's more a case of where if law A exists it can't be enforced unequally. You seem, I think, to be arguing different laws in the transitive. Laws can differ wildly for instance between states. As long as the laws themselves are applied equally in their respective states the laws themselves (one state to another) can treat similar situations very differently.
 
Last edited:
#689
#689
hndog609 said:
I'm not sure that's how EP works. I believe it's more a case of where if law A exists it can't be enforced unequally. You seem, I think, to be arguing different laws in the transitive. Laws can differ wildly for instance between states. As long as the laws themselves are applied equally in their respective states the laws themselves (one state to another) can treat similar situations very differently.
Click to expand...
how things work, vs how they should work, vs how I think they should work are admittedly three different things.

I was stating my beliefs, while responding to someone who started with a generality (no inconvenienced rights), and then had to switch to a specific issue (no inconvenienced gun rights) to refute my point.
 
#691
#691
LouderVol said:
except for the 14th amendment which requires equal application of the law.

and I don't see how you can argue for unequal application of the law.
Click to expand...

Huff hack your account?

Requiring IDs for everyone is equal protection since everyone is treated equally. Voting isn’t protected from infringement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top