2nd-year surge: Tyler Byrd

#1

kamoshika

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
4,291
Likes
20,393
#1
6_4926676.jpg


Byrd’s biggest problem last season was simple: He didn’t always know what he was doing. That’s not a knock on Byrd, either. He thought he was going to play cornerback at Tennessee, and while cornerback requires immense physical talent and indomitable mental toughness, it’s an easier position to learn than wide receiver. Sure, the wide receiver positions can be — and often are — dumbed down for true freshmen, but ultimately there’s still a lot you need to know. And Byrd, like most true freshmen, occasionally looked like he didn’t know what he was doing.

A full offseason and a new position coach (Kevin Beard) have seemed to help Byrd a lot, though, and he said a couple of times this spring that he was able to play faster as a result. If that’s indeed the case, it’s good news for Tennessee and not-so-good news for anyone playing the Vols. Byrd also hinted this spring that he felt like he could — and would — be at least a little more involved in Tennessee’s running game, too.

http://tennessee.247sports.com/Article/Second-Year-Surge-Tennessee-Vols-football-sophomore-wide-receive-53498548
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 people
#3
#3
Realize we need him at corner but we need some play makers on the off. side of the ball as well. Breaking in a new QB we need that guy. The one who can take a screen to the house. I think Byrd has that potential. Can't wait to see what Scott and Beard do with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4
#4
We need corners more than WR. Especially now that Murphy and Jones made it in....

But I hope Byrd balls out
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5
#5
Tough tough call to make about this guy.

We all saw how good he is with the ball in his hands.
- runs hard
- fast
- decisive

He's a potential gamebreaker.

Ultimately he is the best Safety prospect in the WHOLE eastern division.

But we have good safeties. Warrior will be a great one.

We still need Byrd more on offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#8
#8
Think this guy is gonna have a very good year. You usually see WR's make big jumps from their Freshman to Sophomore years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9
#9
Hopefully the part in the article about getting Byrd more involved in the run game is true as well. If we're gonna put him on offense, we need to make sure he's getting plenty of opportunities to touch the ball in as many ways as possible.

It could also be a bit of a boost for us if he turns out to be a weapon in the run game since our depth at RB is still a bit of a question mark at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10
#10
6_4926676.jpg


Byrd’s biggest problem last season was simple: He didn’t always know what he was doing. That’s not a knock on Byrd, either. He thought he was going to play cornerback at Tennessee, and while cornerback requires immense physical talent and indomitable mental toughness, it’s an easier position to learn than wide receiver. Sure, the wide receiver positions can be — and often are — dumbed down for true freshmen, but ultimately there’s still a lot you need to know. And Byrd, like most true freshmen, occasionally looked like he didn’t know what he was doing.

A full offseason and a new position coach (Kevin Beard) have seemed to help Byrd a lot, though, and he said a couple of times this spring that he was able to play faster as a result. If that’s indeed the case, it’s good news for Tennessee and not-so-good news for anyone playing the Vols. Byrd also hinted this spring that he felt like he could — and would — be at least a little more involved in Tennessee’s running game, too.

http://tennessee.247sports.com/Article/Second-Year-Surge-Tennessee-Vols-football-sophomore-wide-receive-53498548

Hmm. It would be interesting seeing him run off tackle, sweeps, and rb/wr screen passes. We should definitely use his home run ability to keep defenses in check. I think with enough touches, Byrd could have a monster season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#11
#11
Would love to see Byrd at Corner

Byrd is one of those rare athletes that could play both ways in the same game. Maybe rest him every third series.
Swap him in quarters. Or some such situation.
But, he is just so valuable to us at both positions.
Why not give it a try in fall practice to see if it works?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
We need corners more than WR. Especially now that Murphy and Jones made it in....

Do we really think a freshman, even with size and speed, can make significant contributions at wide receiver? Even if he has freak capabilities, it's such a complicated position to play today.

FTA: "Sure, the wide receiver positions can be — and often are — dumbed down for true freshmen, but ultimately there’s still a lot you need to know. And Byrd, like most true freshmen, occasionally looked like he didn’t know what he was doing."

In today's offenses, it's tough to dumb down one position without dumbing down or compromising the entire play. Certainly you can't have a freshman as your any-down starter. Within 2 games every DC will have figured out what those freshmen aren't being trusted to do/know, and he will build that into his defensive gameplan.

FTA: "A full offseason and a new position coach (Kevin Beard) have seemed to help Byrd a lot, though, and he said a couple of times this spring that he was able to play faster as a result."

That .3 seconds worth of extra speed is totally lost when the receiver isn't 100% committed to where he's running because he isn't sure what he's seeing from the defense, what the play change signals from the sideline mean for him, even as he's trying to see who on the D might be blitzing and trying to remember which route change he would go to, as he suddenly glimpses that the playclock has now run down to 2 seconds! :blink:

I hope no one's thinking you can send a freshman in for a play with the simple instructions, "Run a slant." Often those QB audibles are changing specific routes based on the defense he sees. And if the QB isn't confident every receiver will be where he's supposed to be, you can knock a full second off the QB's processing speed and add it to extra time in the pocket. He's also lost the opportunity to "look off" any defenders to create a little more space for his intended target.

Playing freshmen at receiver is usually a situational luxury, where the OC is either confident he can get single-coverage (though usually against a more experienced defender) or the freshman knows his reads and assignments facing Defense A or B, and the OC is 90% sure they won't switch to Defense C, D, or E on that play.

Freshmen receivers carry greater potential each play to cause a domino collapse, or a wasted time-out. It's no surprise that our top receiver started his career as a QB. To borrow from the great Yogi, playing receiver is more than 90% half mental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#16
#16
Do we really think a freshman, even with size and speed, can make significant contributions at wide receiver? Even if he has freak capabilities, it's such a complicated position to play today.

FTA: "Sure, the wide receiver positions can be — and often are — dumbed down for true freshmen, but ultimately there’s still a lot you need to know. And Byrd, like most true freshmen, occasionally looked like he didn’t know what he was doing."

In today's offenses, it's tough to dumb down one position without dumbing down or compromising the entire play. Certainly you can't have a freshman as your any-down starter. Within 2 games every DC will have figured out what those freshmen aren't being trusted to do/know, and he will build that into his defensive gameplan.

FTA: "A full offseason and a new position coach (Kevin Beard) have seemed to help Byrd a lot, though, and he said a couple of times this spring that he was able to play faster as a result."

That .3 seconds worth of extra speed is totally lost when the receiver isn't 100% committed to where he's running because he isn't sure what he's seeing from the defense, what the play change signals from the sideline mean for him, even as he's trying to see who on the D might be blitzing and trying to remember which route change he would go to, as he suddenly glimpses that the playclock has now run down to 2 seconds! :blink:

I hope no one's thinking you can send a freshman in for a play with the simple instructions, "Run a slant." Often those QB audibles are changing specific routes based on the defense he sees. And if the QB isn't confident every receiver will be where he's supposed to be, you can knock a full second off the QB's processing speed and add it to extra time in the pocket. He's also lost the opportunity to "look off" any defenders to create a little more space for his intended target.

Playing freshmen at receiver is usually a situational luxury, where the OC is either confident he can get single-coverage (though usually against a more experienced defender) or the freshman knows his reads and assignments facing Defense A or B, and the OC is 90% sure they won't switch to Defense C, D, or E on that play.

Freshmen receivers carry greater potential each play to cause a domino collapse, or a wasted time-out. It's no surprise that our top receiver started his career as a QB. To borrow from the great Yogi, playing receiver is more than 90% half mental.

I think you mentioning Jennings is appropriate. He broke the field wide open several times and had arguably the best moments for a WR at UT since Peerless. As a SOPHOMORE. And he played QB except for a few throws to Dobbs.

I'm not trying to be argumentative but I think you may be over-complicating things. The QB checks down and delivers the ball and the skill positions adjust to a handful of routes or blocking schemes. They aren't calculating re-entry into the atmosphere from space.

Byrd is going to have a big year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#18
#18
Jennings, Calloway, and Byrd will be explosive. They have the potential to be the best receiving corp trio in the SEC. Hopefully Coach Beard has them realize and reach their full potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#19
#19
Byrd is one of those rare athletes that could play both ways in the same game. Maybe rest him every third series.
Swap him in quarters. Or some such situation.
But, he is just so valuable to us at both positions.
Why not give it a try in fall practice to see if it works?

I agree. But an old saying comes to mind "jack of all trades and master of none"....
 
#20
#20
Do we really think a freshman, even with size and speed, can make significant contributions at wide receiver? Even if he has freak capabilities, it's such a complicated position to play today.

FTA: "Sure, the wide receiver positions can be — and often are — dumbed down for true freshmen, but ultimately there’s still a lot you need to know. And Byrd, like most true freshmen, occasionally looked like he didn’t know what he was doing."

In today's offenses, it's tough to dumb down one position without dumbing down or compromising the entire play. Certainly you can't have a freshman as your any-down starter. Within 2 games every DC will have figured out what those freshmen aren't being trusted to do/know, and he will build that into his defensive gameplan.

FTA: "A full offseason and a new position coach (Kevin Beard) have seemed to help Byrd a lot, though, and he said a couple of times this spring that he was able to play faster as a result."

That .3 seconds worth of extra speed is totally lost when the receiver isn't 100% committed to where he's running because he isn't sure what he's seeing from the defense, what the play change signals from the sideline mean for him, even as he's trying to see who on the D might be blitzing and trying to remember which route change he would go to, as he suddenly glimpses that the playclock has now run down to 2 seconds! :blink:

I hope no one's thinking you can send a freshman in for a play with the simple instructions, "Run a slant." Often those QB audibles are changing specific routes based on the defense he sees. And if the QB isn't confident every receiver will be where he's supposed to be, you can knock a full second off the QB's processing speed and add it to extra time in the pocket. He's also lost the opportunity to "look off" any defenders to create a little more space for his intended target.

Playing freshmen at receiver is usually a situational luxury, where the OC is either confident he can get single-coverage (though usually against a more experienced defender) or the freshman knows his reads and assignments facing Defense A or B, and the OC is 90% sure they won't switch to Defense C, D, or E on that play.

Freshmen receivers carry greater potential each play to cause a domino collapse, or a wasted time-out. It's no surprise that our top receiver started his career as a QB. To borrow from the great Yogi, playing receiver is more than 90% half mental.

GREAT POST!!!!
To back up what you say, years ago I heard Coach Dickey say that he liked to recruit high school QBs because the were smarter football players and easier to coach, ect. As I recall, there were always a few high school QBs on his squad. l
 
#21
#21
Tough tough call to make about this guy.

We all saw how good he is with the ball in his hands.
- runs hard
- fast
- decisive

He's a potential gamebreaker.

Ultimately he is the best Safety prospect in the WHOLE eastern division.

But we have good safeties. Warrior will be a great one.

We still need Byrd more on offense.

Then he would be a good one. Jennings would be an absolute animal at safety. He and Warrior would be exceptional, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#22
#22
Realize we need him at corner but we need some play makers on the off. side of the ball as well. Breaking in a new QB we need that guy. The one who can take a screen to the house. I think Byrd has that potential. Can't wait to see what Scott and Beard do with him.

It's time for the second act of Carl Pickens to take place at Tennessee!
 
#23
#23
Hopefully the part in the article about getting Byrd more involved in the run game is true as well. If we're gonna put him on offense, we need to make sure he's getting plenty of opportunities to touch the ball in as many ways as possible.

It could also be a bit of a boost for us if he turns out to be a weapon in the run game since our depth at RB is still a bit of a question mark at this point.

I agree. I see him catching the type of passes Kamara caught. Will be fun seeing him in space.
 
#25
#25
There may never be another Pickens. That year he played DB and WR, he was the best player on both sides of the ball. Oh, yeah, and one hell of a returner, too

He barely played WR that first season...7 total receptions. With Chuck Webb,Reggie Cobb, Thomas Woods, Alvin Harper and Anthony Morgan on the roster, he was nowhere near the top player on the offensive side of the ball. When he exclusively played WR the next season, he met that description.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top