2025 NCAA WBB Tournament non LV games and news

[Rooster1]

Starting off with the official ncaa site that includes selection Sunday countdown and historical moments. First up is the last four minutes of #16 Harvard defeating #1 Stanford. The only win ever in the tournament for any 14-16 seed. Tara V looks so young.

Watch the final 4 minutes of 1998's historic Harvard-Stanford 16-over-1 upset

Watch the final 3:58 of the 1998 first round NCAA women's basketball tournament game between 16-seed Harvard and 1-seed Stanford, held at Stanford. This upset is one of the biggest upsets in sports history and was the first 16-1 upset in either NCAA basketball tournament. Harvard won the game 71-67.

www.ncaa.com

Interesting trivia, a Uconn fan recently posted that Sarah Strong’s mom was on that Harvard team.

 

[Rooster1]

CBSSports is usually fairly accurate in seed predictions…any hoo this is their guess:

Women's Bracketology: UCLA retakes top position as No. 1 seeds are locked up

The Bruins refused to fall to USC a third time this season

www.cbssports.com

NCAA.com which is usually not as accurate:

Final March Madness women's basketball bracket predictions ahead of Selection Sunday

Here are Autumn Johnson's final women's college basketball bracket predictions ahead of Selection Sunday.

www.ncaa.com

Herhoops.com which usually gets it close:

Bracketology | NCAA Women's Basketball 2025 | Her Hoop Stats

2025 NCAA Women's Basketball Tournament Bracketology from Her Hoop Stats

herhoopstats.com

And finally ole Charlie and ESPN who get a lot wrong historically:

Women's Bracketology: Will Princeton or Virginia Tech get the last at-large bid? Tigers get the nod

With Princeton fighting for an at-large bid, could the Ivy League have three teams in the NCAA tournament for the first time?

www.espn.com

 

[Rickster]

So we have south carolina fans starting game threads now or is this another thread where we get to hear about South Carolina all the time? Asking for another vol fan.

 

[Rooster1]

So we have south carolina fans starting game threads now or is this another thread where we get to hear about South Carolina all the time? Asking for another vol fan.

This thread is for all WBB fans Rickster, no requirement to enter it of course, that is your choice. The tourney is 64 teams deep and many WBB enthusiasts follow a few teams or have an interest in the tournament in general. It’s all good.

 

[lvocd]

Interesting trivia, a Uconn fan recently posted that Sarah Strong’s mom was on that Harvard team.

Dang! No wonder Strong is such a great player — her mom is Alison Feaster! She was a terrific player in college and at the professional level.

 

[Rooster1]

Dang! No wonder Strong is such a great player — her mom is Alison Feaster! She was a terrific player in college and at the professional level.

She was Dawn Staley’s roommate in the WNBA….

 

[knoxvol52]

This thread is for all WBB fans Rickster, no requirement to enter it of course, that is your choice. The tourney is 64 teams deep and many WBB enthusiasts follow a few teams or have an interest in the tournament in general. It’s all good.

68 teams actually but who's counting?

She was Dawn Staley’s roommate in the WNBA….

 

[Rooster1]

Sarah’s mom:

Feaster-Strong attended Harvard College, graduating in 1998 with a degree in Economics, and setting multiple Ivy League women's basketball records along the way. She was selected as a first-team All-Ivy League player each of her four years, and was the first athlete in any sport to be honored as Ivy League Player of the Yearthree times, after also having been Ivy League Rookie of the Year.[3]

I think she scored 33 in that game vs Stanford..

 

[Rickster]

Got it. You will drive this thread like you did with the SEC tourney thread. You’re already above 50% of posts. Doesn’t take a Genius to see where this is going.

 

[Rooster1]

Got it. You will drive this thread like you did with the SEC tourney thread. You’re already above 50% of posts. Doesn’t take a Genius to see where this is going.

Well Rickster, some of us are genuinely just WBB fans, and with no axes to grind. I’m excited for the upcoming tournament, like a lot of other fans. I will probably watch almost all of the games, even the lower seeded ones, it’s a great time of the year to enjoy the game. Peace.

Btw, as the sport grows I find it hard to not follow all of the great players/programs across the country. I’m 63 now, no time to waste on petty stuff that would take away from the joy of watching these young women play the game, wherever they go to school.

 

[Rooster1]

The 2024-2025 NCAA WBB selection committee members:

DI Women’s Basketball Committee OKs quadrant-based team sheets, complete seed list - NCAA.org

At its summer meeting this week in Austin, Texas, the NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Committee approved a move to quadrant-based team sheets in 2024-25 and to

www.ncaa.org

These are the folks who select and seed. Outside of Northwestern, no P4 schools have a voice on this committee. It could be a good thing, I’m really not sure.

But this is an interesting change this year:

”The committee also voted to remove "conference record" and "nonconference record" from the championship selection criteria, noting that the existing criteria of "overall record" is inclusive of that information.”

 

[Rickster]

Well Rickster, some of us are genuinely just WBB fans, and with no axes to grind.

Who has an axe to grind? Don’t turn this into the persecuted chicken thread. I just don’t care to have USC shoved in front of my face all the time. I also don’t like posters who believe every post is directed to them and they’re obligated to reply to each and every one then become entitled.

 

[Rooster1]

Who has an axe to grind? Don’t turn this into the persecuted chicken thread. I just don’t care to have USC shoved in front of my face all the time. I also don’t like posters who believe every post is directed to them and they’re obligated to reply to each and every one then become entitled.

This thread is about 68 teams from the start, including Tennessee. It’s just about the ladies March Madness Rick. Feel free to replace this thread with your own, makes no difference to me Rick. It’s all good.

 

[madtownvol]

CBSSports is usually fairly accurate in seed predictions…any hoo this is their guess:

Women's Bracketology: UCLA retakes top position as No. 1 seeds are locked up

The Bruins refused to fall to USC a third time this season

www.cbssports.com

NCAA.com which is usually not as accurate:

Final March Madness women's basketball bracket predictions ahead of Selection Sunday

Here are Autumn Johnson's final women's college basketball bracket predictions ahead of Selection Sunday.

www.ncaa.com

Herhoops.com which usually gets it close:

Bracketology | NCAA Women's Basketball 2025 | Her Hoop Stats

2025 NCAA Women's Basketball Tournament Bracketology from Her Hoop Stats

herhoopstats.com

And finally ole Charlie and ESPN who get a lot wrong historically:

Women's Bracketology: Will Princeton or Virginia Tech get the last at-large bid? Tigers get the nod

With Princeton fighting for an at-large bid, could the Ivy League have three teams in the NCAA tournament for the first time?

www.espn.com

A 5th seed for the LVs seems about right.

 

[Rooster1]

The 2024-2025 NCAA WBB selection committee members:

DI Women’s Basketball Committee OKs quadrant-based team sheets, complete seed list - NCAA.org

At its summer meeting this week in Austin, Texas, the NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Committee approved a move to quadrant-based team sheets in 2024-25 and to

www.ncaa.org

These are the folks who select and seed. Outside of Northwestern, no P4 schools have a voice on this committee. It could be a good thing, I’m really not sure.

But this is an interesting change this year:

”The committee also voted to remove "conference record" and "nonconference record" from the championship selection criteria, noting that the existing criteria of "overall record" is inclusive of that information.”

”The committee also voted to remove "conference record" and "nonconference record" from the championship selection criteria, noting that the existing criteria of "overall record" is inclusive of that information.”

This will play into the seedings big time this year unless I’m wrong. Outside of the quad changes, this is the biggest for implications on Sunday, and the source of what some will call surprises. It likely helps teams from leagues like the Ivey League, or teams from P4 that scheduled weak. Think on that one.

 

[Rooster1]

A 5th seed for the LVs seems about right.

I think UT will be above both Bama and OM in the 5th seeds however @madtownvol . We will see, but H2H still matters imo, and the Uconn win should carry heavy weight. Plus they showed during the season against the heavy weights they can play with anyone when it’s right for them.

 

[glv98]

Some of those projected pods look pretty promising for the LVs. If they get recharged at all, I like their chances against Maryland or Ohio St. to get to S16

 

[Rooster1]

Some of those projected pods look pretty promising for the LVs. If they get recharged at all, I like their chances against Maryland or Ohio St. to get to S16

This could be a team that breaks the norm from the 5 seed and goes deeper than any team previous from that slot if they can get back to their earlier form. Knocking off Uconn showed that already. It’s gonna be exciting watching.

Kinda like my golf game, when I get in a funk, sometimes it really helps to walk away for a few weeks. I don’t know how that helps me but it does. Golf is such a mind game.

 

[Rooster1]

How many upsets should you be picking in your WBB brackets?

How many upsets you should be picking in your women's bracket

Bracket expert Wayne Staats reveals the data behind how many upsets to pick when filling in your March Madness bracket for the women's tournament.

www.ncaa.com

 

[LadyVol1908]

She was Dawn Staley’s roommate in the WNBA….

I’m so thankful their relationship didn’t sway Strong to South Carolina! Imagine a front line of Strong and Edwards for 4 years! Coupled with Fulwiley for 3!

 

[Coach Jumper]

Got it. You will drive this thread like you did with the SEC tourney thread. You’re already above 50% of posts. Doesn’t take a Genius to see where this is going.

60%

 

[Rooster1]

Oregon State back in the tournament:

”Last year, Oregon State was the feel-good story of March Madness, reaching the Elite Eight after starting the season unranked. Then the top four scorers and five of the top seven transferred when the Beavers joined the WCC following the demise of the Pac-12. In a new league with a new lineup, a difficult regular season followed for coach Scott Rueck and the Beavers. Oregon State entered the WCC tournament as the No. 4 seed with a 16-15 overall record. Three games later, including wins over WCC No. 1 seed Gonzaga and No. 2 seed Portland in Las Vegas, the Beavers had a conference tournament title and the most improbable of Rueck's nine trips to the NCAA tournament with Oregon State”

 

[knoxvol52]

60%

That's it, stir the pot...

 

[VolBall09]

Laying here this morning fantasizing about us coming out and having a good showing in the tourney. This team is more than capable. Just have to rest up, get re focused and find their mojo again.

We need to be a bit less predictable.

 

[StorrsCentral]

Case for UConn getting a #1 seed:

1- Yes they are in the Big East, a very weak conference. But it's not like they are just getting by but are beating the crap out of these teams.
2- They beat the crap out of SC, the SEC champion in their own building.
3- They lost to USC, the BIG regular season champion by 2 points
4- They are #1 in the NET standings
5- In the latest AP poll, they are still ranked third, but have received 7 first place votes.
6- Vegas has incorporated them as the favorites to win the NC. I saw that the other day, but of course, this is Vegas and it could have changed since then. I don't think so.
7- Since their last loss, Aubrey Griffin and Azzi Fudd have joined the team after rehab from injuries.
8- Everyone here thinks that ESPN is a friend of UConn, but they are not. If they were, they would have found a place for them near the top. They are heavily invested in the SEC and thus put a lot of weight on their loss to Tennessee.

So, I don't think the committee will give them aq #1, but that is why I question if the NET means anything. Just my opinion but won't loose any sleep over it.
The best #2 would be the same as the fourth #1 anyway.