I only addressed the part where you insinuated that they're a good G5 type team by only saying they're not a P4 team. Yes, they had a winning record, just barely. Tennessee could've beaten any of the local high schools with a winning record and it would mean as much as beating ETSU, but still...
Well, yeah, because you can't answer a 7 word question, with only 2 words being 2+ syllables, it certainly would. Self burns are rare, but you definitely did that better than answering the basic question.
Go ahead. It was a yes or no question which clearly was too difficult for you despite only having 1 word with more than 2 syllables, which you already used so one would think you know what that means, so not sure why you're trying to throw insults.
All these people mad about his reaction fail to realize they're the ones in threads like these.
https://www.volnation.com/forum/threads/30-for-30-on-%E2%80%9897-heisman-on-now-it%E2%80%99s-fantastic.359947/
Again, winning the conference was not a variable to the conversation when I responded to it. It was simply "no other team with 3 losses would be in", which is false.
That was never part of the stipulation I was responding to. Adding variables like that completely changes the argument, and if that's what was meant that should've been stated.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.