Add 3 points in the OK game still lose 33-30. All the “butterfly effects” of hitting that kick are conjecture. Still need 4 more points.
We were up 28-27 in the Illinois game when they kicked the GW kick. Not sure how you figure that would have been to tie the game with the FG make. Add 3...
The scoop and score that happened BEFORE that cost us 7 points (7>3), killed momentum (we were up 7-0 marching to another TD or FG with 1st and 10 at the OK 24) and those 7 points proved all the more important in the second half. Additionally, 2 interceptions (both in Q2 just like the missed FG)...
This is my point about the “butterfly effect”. As far as impact on the game, how many times a kicker has an opportunity or how his failures are remembered are immaterial. That’s just bias. His F/Us are not more “costly”. In a game when you are trying to outscore your opponent, a 7 point (which...
I don’t disagree. He was not doing his job and we can upgrade. He’s moved on and we will.
That’s all true. IMO, there is a difference in ”being part of the problem” and “Max cost us 3 games”. It is simplistic, unfair to him and willfully blind of other issues that cost us games. I’m explaining...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.