False dilemma. The University can negotiate contracts with whatever entities they wish.
Given the history of college sports exploiting athletes, your choice if the word "masters" seems to be a Freudian Slip.
A University can be about whatever the leadership chooses.
High school kids will still get taken by colleges. The less than elite ones will simply have to go G5 or JUCO for a couple of years, then transfer to a P4 school if they want to play in the big time, and if they are good enough.
That is accurate for the House case settmenent only. NIL doesn't count, since it's not revenue sharing. The direct pay of money from the Alston case doesn't count as revenue sharing, either. That lawyer is either ignorant or intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
CFB athletes already get paid in two ways in addition to NIL.
1. The money for expenses that they get from the NCAA vs Alston case ruling. i.e. "Alston Money".
2. Revenue sharing from the NCAA as a result of the House vs NCAA settlement.
They already get paid directly by the schools and the...
Guardrails? The NCAA can't get out of its own way in court.
Why should there be eligibility limits or an age limit? Because it was always like that??? We know how much weight that carried in court.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.