They're right. Cramping is all Muschamp can come up with. Vols are lucky their top choice, Muschamp, turned them down in favor of their 5th choice. :lolabove:
Which board? Most of the ones I've read are giving Tennessee's O due respect. Are you just making this up to give you a chip on your shoulder heading into Saturday?
You guys took a step back last year and lost to UK. This year, you look the same as you did last year through two games.
Yes, I feel we're better so far in year two under Muschamp than in year one.
Muschamp inherited a mess of his own last year. The depth issues he inherited especially...
Thanks. I appreciate the salute. This kind of talk about who belongs in what category historically is a matter of perception. If certain fanbases think of each other in the same group, then that group is formed. Michigan, OSU, BAma, USCw, ND and Oklahoma look at each other as equals from a...
I'm not saying they're not historically relevant but I am saying that UT is not a blue blood. Bama is the only blueblood in the SEC. If you don't believe me, Go on OSU, Mich, ND or USCw boards and ask them.
HAHAHAHAHA. I'm amused at the fact you're implying your program is "old money" while you deride UF as a "noveau riche" program. Also, I get a kick out of the implication that the generational love for UT football will get UT through hard times while UF's alleged lack of generational followers...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.