Recent content by orangetanker11

I agree. However I think we are screwed if he stays. With the money we will be spending, I find it hard to believe we would end up with someone as bad as Dooley.

Green is the workhorse in Green Bay.

I did do the research. I'm rarely on this site, so if you were too impatient to await a response, that's on you. I'm just sick of the Dooley apologists that constantly grasp at straws to try and prove he isn't a loser.

He didn't lay any foundation. 20 of his recruits are in the two deep, and those players have been coached to win by Dykes. He was a loser in the WAC, just like he is a loser here. If you are too stupid to defend the loser, then I can't help you. By the way, I don't spend too much time on...

Yes. That's why I said they aren't Dooley's players.

Alabama - 55 Tennessee - 7 CP yards - 91

Lets say we keep Dooley next year without Hunter, Bray, Patterson, Rivera, and a few linemen. How do you think that will turn out? Better than this year? If your answer is no, then we need to make a change this year.

You must be a true fan.

Too lazy to actually do the research?

Wrong.

Dynamite analysis from another moron that's too stupid to abandon a sinking ship. Tell me more about how Dooley is so great.

Bullsh**. If he was creating better situations, then why was he a loser there just like he is here?

Retarded. Very few contributing players on this LA Tech squad were from the Dooley regime. Dykes hit the JUCO ranks hard when he took over. Dooley has nothing to do with their success.

Dooley has nothing to do with the fact that the current LA Tech team is doing well this year. Except, of course, because he isn't there.

Too bad it's not true.