Recent content by MKEvol

Yes. He signed with Wasserman to represent him, and is also training with former Purdue RB turned private coach Josh Hicks for Combine/Pro-day prep.

Haven’t seen them publicly announce it, but it is Wednesday March 27 at noon.

Didn't expect this alert this morning in my inbox. What a wild ride that week was. 2 weeks into Heupel's tenure and HB fans were shredding the program claiming they hoped HB would come back to destroy TN. Now we are 18-3 on our last 21 games with wins over Saban and Dabo. A NY6 bowl win. I...

Repping TN on the undershirt and wristbands at fall practice

Ill repost here...

Chose one what? That trust was an educational benefit, it had nothing to do with a personal right to publicity. What that holding said was that schools had two different ways of meeting the law: 1) provide a stipend for the true cost of attendance or 2) Hold in a trust (with a cap of $5k)...

Correct, and it will be the first case that hopefully goes to SCOTUS to address NIL. We will then see if Kavanuagh is alone in his thoughts, or if the Court agrees with him.

I see you copied and pasted this from Wikipedia on O'Bannon, so I find it curious that you left out the most vital part of your argument - the one that proves you have no clue what you are talking about. It goes right between your two paragraphs... She ordered that schools should be allowed to...

I have literally addressed both of these points. Directly to you in fact. Do you have any reading comprehension ability at all? Re O'Bannon I said: O'Bannon held that the NCAA could not cap scholarships below the "true cost of attendance, PLUS $5k/year in a trust for those S-As. Scholarships...

No. I'd just like to get this thread discussion back to Tate and disappear to reading this thread instead of trying to clean up misunderstandings about future NCAA regulations on NIL. You've repeatedly said that the NCAA cannot limit NIL because SCOTUS smacked them around - so which case was...

Simple question. If SCOTUS smacked them around and the NCAA can no longer regulate NIL....what case to you think it was that has that holding?

I am vastly simplifying this because explaining class action would take forever. But I am also not a class-action specialist so if someone out there reading this is, please free to add. A first player would sue under federal antitrust law. (In practice, the attorney would likely at this point...

Oh it totally would, and I think it would look ridiculous too. I can't say for certain but I think the NCAA is much more concerned about "money as an inducement" than a kid exercising his rights of publicity (traditional marketing/sponsorship). So to me, I'd think an age restriction would be...

For like the 10th time, NO. SCOTUS. HAS. NOT. My entire point all along has been to clear up this exact thought. The NCAA has never been challenged in court re: NIL regulations. Not one single time. Which is why they still have a full arsenal to regulate. They have lost twice solely based on...

They wouldn't have to defend thousands upon thousands of lawsuits. These would all be put into one single class-action suit that the NCAA would have to defend one time per rule.