In fact, the view of the replay is partially blocked by the head of the official who made the initial call and had a better view of the play than anyone (including the replay official).
I kept asking "how do they not have another angle?" From seeing the CBS angle, I thought it was probably not a touchdown, but was definitely inconclusive. You just could not even see his left hand to tell what was going on.
It is just so frustrating to see people (announcers, vol fans, uga...
I saw a fumble also. But at what point?
If there was definitive evidence, then one should be able to express arguments supporting that point (i.e. "the ball was spinning in his hand before he crossed the goal line" or "the ball left his hand altogether before crossing the goal line" or "the...
I myself watched it a thousand times. I would think we could both agree that if we both watched it a thousand times, then there is something very unclear about whether or not it was a touchdown, and to overturn the ruling on the field, there should exist definitive evidence.
I would love to hear what compelled the replay official to overturn the call. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, he doesn't post on Vol Nation.
I was asking you, as someone who agrees with the replay official, to perhaps offer some reasons behind your opinion that there is definitive proof...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.