Republicans Belief in Evolution plummets

#1,201
#1,201
Septic said:
It's clear you don't grasp the theory of evolution if you're asserting evolutionists believe that we "came from monkeys". I suppose it should come as little surprise that this is what you've been indoctrinated to believe.

We are cousins to monkeys, we share a common ancestor. There are no missing links.

Your Bigfoot argument is unquestionably the worst argument is 80 pages of this thread.
Click to expand...

I'm quite well versed.


What I need you to do is explain all the drawings on the caves by Aztecs, Chinese, Japanese, etc of flying carriages.

Were they all high?

Bigfoot is (to me) a stage of evolution. A prehistoric us on the way up the food chain.
 
#1,205
#1,205
Obsesed said:
I'm quite well versed.


What I need you to do is explain all the drawings on the caves by Aztecs, Chinese, Japanese, etc of flying carriages.

Were they all high?

Bigfoot is (to me) a stage of evolution. A prehistoric us on the way up the food chain.
Click to expand...

Awesome. This is why I keep coming back.
 
#1,209
#1,209
Obsessed said:
I've read them. You seem to take them literally. I take them as new way to think.

Please explain why what I suggest is impossible
Click to expand...

You've read what? You clearly have no idea what science has revealed about human evolution.

Or are you referring to having read up on Bigfoot, that seems like that would be more your speed. No offense.
 
#1,212
#1,212
Septic said:
You've read what? You clearly have no idea what science has revealed about human evolution.

Or are you referring to having read up on Bigfoot, that seems like that would be more your speed. No offense.
Click to expand...

Non taken. I read everything. I try to absorb it all. I am not a closed minded individual.

None of us know anything for certain. And it's presumptions to think we do.
 
#1,213
#1,213
Obsessed said:
So we are clear.

No way possible a "Bigfoot" is a humanoid?

No way possible it's part of the evolutionary change?

No way?
Click to expand...

Bigfoot is described as humanoid I suppose. However, I've never heard, read or seen any credible evidence for his existence. If you can point to some, I'd love to see it. I don't believe in Bigfoot, but with evidence I'll gladly change my position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,215
#1,215
Septic said:
Bigfoot is described as humanoid I suppose. However, I've never heard, read or seen any credible evidence for his existence. If you can point to some, I'd love to see it. I don't believe in Bigfoot, but with evidence I'll gladly change my position.
Click to expand...

That's not the point. You have proof. Drawings. Carvings. From all over the world. You just choose not to believe it.

My premise is this: if we can have one, why not the other?

Evolution is what it is. I believe in it. I think it coincides with Christianity.

Why can we not have both?
God to me could very well be alien. ( what we perceive)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,216
#1,216
Septic said:
Bigfoot is described as humanoid I suppose. However, I've never heard, read or seen any credible evidence for his existence. If you can point to some, I'd love to see it. I don't believe in Bigfoot, but with evidence I'll gladly change my position.
Click to expand...

Have you seen any credible evidence for the existence of the so called "common ancestor" we are supposed to share with apes?
 
#1,221
#1,221
SergeantVol said:
I thought there was missing fossil evidence between homo erectus and homo sapien sapiens.
Click to expand...

There is. This guys full of sheet. As usual. There is not a factual chain of primates evolving into men. Know why? Because it didn't happen...though these heathens would love to lead you to believe their desired evolutionary chain is flawless.
 
#1,222
#1,222
Septic said:
It's clear you don't grasp the theory of evolution if you're asserting evolutionists believe that we "came from monkeys". I suppose it should come as little surprise that this is what you've been indoctrinated to believe.

We are cousins to monkeys, we share a common ancestor. There are no missing links.

Your Bigfoot argument is unquestionably the worst argument is 80 pages of this thread.
Click to expand...

BS. There is not a conclusive chain of fossils depicting a steady transition from any primate to man. Good try though. The limited fossils of "cavemen" that have been found have serious inconsistencies in the timeline as dated by strata they were found in and radioactive carbon dating. Also...mass quantities of any of these examples are never found...as if they were...you know...the species that populated the earth at that time. I believe this is because they are genetic anomolies...much like are born today. Dwarfs, 7 feet tall giants..people with fur...horns...tails...all those are born today. They are not links in a chain. They are mutations. If you want to bet your soul on science...be accurate about it. Don't misrepresent things as absolute fact when they simply are not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,224
#1,224
marcusluvsvols said:
There is. This guys full of sheet. As usual. There is not a factual chain of primates evolving into men. Know why? Because it didn't happen...though these heathens would love to lead you to believe their desired evolutionary chain is flawless.
Click to expand...

Checkmate Heathens!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top