volatil
Villains
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 42,084
- Likes
- 100,405
Proof is he's innocent. Proof is she had more than one semen sample in her. She's also apart of the group of girls that call themselves the FSUCLEATCHASERS. But I guess that's not proof.
And another thing I was right and I'm extremely glad I was. Don't want a kid to rape anyone or be convicted of charges that aren't the truth.
. Proof is she had more than one semen sample in her.
The biggest problem I have is this. They were hollering that they believe the kid did it. Evidence comes out that she lied and now they won't say the man didn't do it. It's all there's more to it or he wouldn't have gotten charged anyways. What do you guys want a rape to have taken place? I mean give me a break.....
Breaker, I like you, but there's absolutely no evidence whatsoever that she lied. The DA simply stated that there was not enough evidence they felt they could win a conviction. There's a big difference. A man could rape a female jogger at night, and there may still not be enough evidence to convict him. Rape is one of the most difficult crimes to prosecute given the fact that people are known to have consensual sex from time-to-time, or so I've heard.
Proof is he's innocent. Proof is she had more than one semen sample in her. She's also apart of the group of girls that call themselves the FSUCLEATCHASERS. But I guess that's not proof.
And another thing I was right and I'm extremely glad I was. Don't want a kid to rape anyone or be convicted of charges that aren't the truth.
I, for one, and am pretty damn sure nobody else, ever said we thought he did it for certain(if I did, show me). Unlike you, who said matter of factly, she's full of shat and nothing but a money grabbing ho. You have/had zero proof (knowing a family member doesn't count either, sry) of what she did or didn't do or what he did or didn't do. ZERO! Neither do I. None of us do. Period.
The only one who was saying the girl or Winston was for sure 100% guilty was you and it's like you want us to apologize to you or something. Please lol. All I did was ask you how the heck you couldn't even consider that he may have actually done something wrong to that girl (regardless of whatever one of his cousin's or whoever tells you ab him). I damn sure considered she is a money hungry ho. You don't think there's any way fsu, their big money boosters, high ranking state attorneys, ect could have pulled whatever strings they had to behind the scenes to keep their star qb on the #1 team eligible to go on and win the heisman and play for a NC, which would bring in hundreds of millions of dollars to the school? Yeah, right.
None of us have insinuated that we thought Winston was guilty, much less straight up say that we thought he was. You're the only one doing what you're accusing us of.
Step back and take a look in the mirror........guy. I'm done with you on this topic. smh
Did you read the investigation? Wetzel has a summary. ALL the evidence points to it not being rape, including witnesses. No bruising, no drugs, multiple dna taken from her. All you people demanding proof of his innocence have literally 0 evidence of guilt. So, yes, all the evidence says she lied.
So all you have to go on is an accusation, but you're obviously bent toward assuming he's guilty if you're demanding proof of his innocence.
You obviously haven't read the report. Either it's a massive conspiracy at all levels in the Florida justice system, or she lied.
