Recruiting Forum: Football Talk IX

Status
Not open for further replies.
Proof is he's innocent. Proof is she had more than one semen sample in her. She's also apart of the group of girls that call themselves the FSUCLEATCHASERS. But I guess that's not proof.

And another thing I was right and I'm extremely glad I was. Don't want a kid to rape anyone or be convicted of charges that aren't the truth.

:pepper: Woo hoo! BB figured it all out.

FSUCLEATCHASERS........awww hell nah......that ho is guilty. If that's not proof I don't know wtf is.

Thank Goodness. Guess that's the end of that topic.

Moving on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
. Proof is she had more than one semen sample in her.

This is the part I thought the state attorney did a horrible job with today.

He told us that there were two men which immediately led me to discredited the women. However well after that statement he divulged that the 2nd DNA match was her boyfriends. Having sex with a boyfriend ealier in the evening certainly doesn't make the women a liar or a rape less likely.

He never explained more than about when those 2 encounters happened. I think that's key to the entire picture of he said she said.
 
The authorities involved are unprofessional, potentially corrupt idiots who should loose their jobs.

Despite that, it's time to move on. If he is innocent, the right outcome happened. If he is guilty, he can take it up with his maker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Actually USC insiders say that Peterson flopped in his interview. They said that his responses and his pitch were really bad.

Wow. A 92-12 (.885) head coaching record should speak for itself. Kifflin must have been a great interviewer.
 
SEC refs would have taken that touchdown away from Cincy. That's one place I hope to see improvement next year. Better officiating in the SEC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The biggest problem I have is this. They were hollering that they believe the kid did it. Evidence comes out that she lied and now they won't say the man didn't do it. It's all there's more to it or he wouldn't have gotten charged anyways. What do you guys want a rape to have taken place? I mean give me a break.....

Breaker, I like you, but there's absolutely no evidence whatsoever that she lied. The DA simply stated that there was not enough evidence they felt they could win a conviction. There's a big difference. A man could rape a female jogger at night, and there may still not be enough evidence to convict him. Rape is one of the most difficult crimes to prosecute given the fact that people are known to have consensual sex from time-to-time, or so I've heard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Breaker, I like you, but there's absolutely no evidence whatsoever that she lied. The DA simply stated that there was not enough evidence they felt they could win a conviction. There's a big difference. A man could rape a female jogger at night, and there may still not be enough evidence to convict him. Rape is one of the most difficult crimes to prosecute given the fact that people are known to have consensual sex from time-to-time, or so I've heard.

Did you read the investigation? Wetzel has a summary. ALL the evidence points to it not being rape, including witnesses. No bruising, no drugs, multiple dna taken from her. All you people demanding proof of his innocence have literally 0 evidence of guilt. So, yes, all the evidence says she lied.

So all you have to go on is an accusation, but you're obviously bent toward assuming he's guilty if you're demanding proof of his innocence.
 
Proof is he's innocent. Proof is she had more than one semen sample in her. She's also apart of the group of girls that call themselves the FSUCLEATCHASERS. But I guess that's not proof.

And another thing I was right and I'm extremely glad I was. Don't want a kid to rape anyone or be convicted of charges that aren't the truth.

After reading more of your posts now on the subject, you sound like a dumbass. Stop before you sound even dumber.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
I, for one, and am pretty damn sure nobody else, ever said we thought he did it for certain(if I did, show me). Unlike you, who said matter of factly, she's full of shat and nothing but a money grabbing ho. You have/had zero proof (knowing a family member doesn't count either, sry) of what she did or didn't do or what he did or didn't do. ZERO! Neither do I. None of us do. Period.

The only one who was saying the girl or Winston was for sure 100% guilty was you and it's like you want us to apologize to you or something. Please lol. All I did was ask you how the heck you couldn't even consider that he may have actually done something wrong to that girl (regardless of whatever one of his cousin's or whoever tells you ab him). I damn sure considered she is a money hungry ho. You don't think there's any way fsu, their big money boosters, high ranking state attorneys, ect could have pulled whatever strings they had to behind the scenes to keep their star qb on the #1 team eligible to go on and win the heisman and play for a NC, which would bring in hundreds of millions of dollars to the school? Yeah, right.

None of us have insinuated that we thought Winston was guilty, much less straight up say that we thought he was. You're the only one doing what you're accusing us of.

Step back and take a look in the mirror........guy. I'm done with you on this topic. smh

Give up bro. He's clueless. Seriously.
 
I have never wanted to move on from a subject more than this.

How about this weather.

You think interest rates will go up?

How about Obama's dog knocking down that little Bama fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Did you read the investigation? Wetzel has a summary. ALL the evidence points to it not being rape, including witnesses. No bruising, no drugs, multiple dna taken from her. All you people demanding proof of his innocence have literally 0 evidence of guilt. So, yes, all the evidence says she lied.

So all you have to go on is an accusation, but you're obviously bent toward assuming he's guilty if you're demanding proof of his innocence.

You stop too. You have no idea how rapes (in the plural) can work. Good god! You act like the woman ought have been beaten, bruised, and bloody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
You stop too. You have no idea how rapes (in the plural) can work. Good god! You act like the woman ought have been beaten, bruised, and bloody.

You obviously haven't read the report. Either it's a massive conspiracy at all levels in the Florida justice system, or she lied.
 
An interview for a résumé like that didn't even need to happen.

His win/loss record should have been all that mattered

Its obvious Haden doesnt look at win-loss records. Plus, Haden's the dumbazz who hired LK. Who cares what Haden thinks.
 
You obviously haven't read the report. Either it's a massive conspiracy at all levels in the Florida justice system, or she lied.

You jumped on me bro, you jumped on me. I didn't post anything regarding whether or not Winston was guilty. I simply don't like people questioning a woman in such a case. Sure, she could be an *******, but maybe not. And yes, I read the report. :good!:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top