Recruiting Forum: Football Talk VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
#453
#453
Pacer92 said:
K.....Just like ours was waayyy better than their O-line too right!?! We out rushed them ONLY because of killing the clock, meaningless, rushes against their 3rd team defense!
Click to expand...

Look at draft stock and pro potential of the two teams olineman...its not even close.
 
#456
#456
Pacer92 said:
Look at it between UT's and Oregon's O-line...it's not even close....oh wait...
Click to expand...

Running the kind of offense that oregon has they want quicker smaller lineman, which doesnt translate to the nfl. UO also has the best best QB/RB combo in the nation that fit their offense to a T.

if you honestly think that WKU has one OL that would start for Florida you are high.
 
#457
#457
volprof said:
They're not very smart? Or just don't care about anyone else?
Click to expand...
Maybe he cares about all the guys upon whose backs is built a billion dollar industry while they receive relatively squat. Just looking at the bigger picture here
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#458
#458
HankHill said:
Running the kind of offense that oregon has they want quicker smaller lineman, which doesnt translate to the nfl. UO also has the best best QB/RB combo in the nation that fit their offense to a T.

if you honestly think that WKU has one OL that would start for Florida you are high.
Click to expand...

I didn't say that. I implied that if you put WKU's offense with Florida's defense....you wouldn't notice a huge difference.
 
#459
#459
Pacer92 said:
I didn't say that. I implied that if you put WKU's offense with Florida's defense....you wouldn't notice a huge difference.
Click to expand...

I highly doubt that UF will turn the ball over 6 times against us. I also high doubt that they would only score 24 points against South Alabama. they would probably flip that.

Oh well Agree to Disagree :hi:

I just want to see a good competitive game saturday
 
#460
#460
HankHill said:
I highly doubt that UF will turn the ball over 6 times against us. I also high doubt that they would only score 24 points against South Alabama. they would probably flip that.

Oh well Agree to Disagree :hi:

I just want to see a good competitive game saturday
Click to expand...

I don't think we could ever hope to be as fortunate to get 5 TO's in 6 possessions in my life time again. Man for man, yes, UF is better than WKU's offense most every day. I just see a lot of similarities in their personnel.

:hi:
 
#461
#461
WebbCobb said:
Maybe he cares about all the guys upon whose backs is built a billion dollar industry while they receive relatively squat. Just looking at the bigger picture here
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Read my other posts.
 
#462
#462
theutvolunteers said:
Worst words I've read all day. We're facked with Noodles playing QB.
Click to expand...

I sure wish we had a quarterback like that guy who plays for Clemson.

Anyway, Butch didn't even let the Freshman have a fair shot, right? I figure he wouldn't throw them out in the swamp, but I wish he'd have considered it. I guess Worley is better than Peterman. (????)
 
#464
#464
Anybody know the name of the kid out of McEachern or somewhere there abouts in Georgia?

He's a junior, I believe, and super fast, pretty skinny looking.

Caught a glimpse of him on CSS one night...
 
#466
#466
PassedOutAwake said:
it feels like a lot of you are making predictions of us getting blown out, like yall are competing to be right on how bad we suck. yall act like upsets never happen in college football.

someone could put out a prediction of UF27-UT13 and some of you would argue that we are worse than that. "no way we hold them under 30", "no way we have 100 yards rushing".

sounds like the consensus is that they put up more than 30, we have under 7 and put up like 30 yards rushing and 45 yards passing.


so heres my prediction:

UF - 750 yards
UT - 75 yards

UF - 77 points
UT - 3 points

is this how im supposed to support the team?
Click to expand...


What???...is Palardy suddenly an All-American?...how we gonna get that 3?...Meh!!! Double Meh!!! Sunshine pumpers :)
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#467
#467
Ya'll, I just don't understand this Arian Foster thing. Tacos? If it were for a cheesy potato burrito, a chocotaco, or some interesting taco concoction, I could get it. Money for tacos? Come on, man! Chocotaco!
 
#468
#468
I guarantee you, they didn't take Dobbs so he could stay back and get in the playbook ALL weekend, as Im pretty sure they have told him to LEARN the playbook. They probably have some asst coach testing him and working on the plays and playbook this weekend................
 
#469
#469
grobin4300 said:
I guarantee you, they didn't take Dobbs so he could stay back and get in the playbook ALL weekend, as Im pretty sure they have told him to LEARN the playbook. They probably have some asst coach testing him and working on the plays and playbook this weekend................
Click to expand...

I guarantee you this is a stupid post. They didn't take dobbs, because it would be dumb to take 4 QBs when you are only allowed 70 on the travel roster
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#470
#470
If it's gonna be Worley all the way then he's gonna have to run the ball himself a few times on the zone reads. He's gotta be at least a threat to run it even if it only goes for a couple yards. I actually thought he was just told to hand it off every time until I saw the comment from CBJ that said he's had the option to run.

That's why I was really hoping someone else would start. I don't get it. The coaches have obviously seen how inaccurate Worley is and know he's the least mobile of all four. Do the coaches still think it's not all really Worley's fault? Are the other three really that far behind? Do they not wanna start who they really want to bc we're playing a really good defense at the swamp and would rather wait until next week vs USA? What is it? My little bit of optimism just took a shot if JW plays all game. Fingers crossed he puts it together somehow.
 
#472
#472
vol2013 said:
I guarantee you this is a stupid post. They didn't take dobbs, because it would be dumb to take 4 QBs when you are only allowed 70 on the travel roster
Click to expand...

so THAT explains why we took 4 to Oregon? Pretty sure the travel roster has nothing to do with it. More like he's not where the other three are as far as development is concerned. Please think before you post and call someone else's post stupid...
 
#473
#473
volamite86 said:
so THAT explains why we took 4 to Oregon? Pretty sure the travel roster has nothing to do with it. More like he's not where the other three are as far as development is concerned. Please think before you post and call someone else's post stupid...
Click to expand...

SEC has different rules.
 
#474
#474
volprof said:
Ya'll, I just don't understand this Arian Foster thing. Tacos? If it were for a cheesy potato burrito, a chocotaco, or some interesting taco concoction, I could get it. Money for tacos? Come on, man! Chocotaco!
Click to expand...

I won't lie...when I go to Taco Bell, I order like 6 or 7 hard shell tacos. That's it.
 
#475
#475
volamite86 said:
so THAT explains why we took 4 to Oregon? Pretty sure the travel roster has nothing to do with it. More like he's not where the other three are as far as development is concerned. Please think before you post and call someone else's post stupid...
Click to expand...

That was an out of conference game genius, there are not the restrictions on out of conference travel rosters that there are for conference games.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top