The Breakerboy
DBU
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 28,668
- Likes
- 8,885
We knew it was bad so feel free to ignore it and belittle any poster discussing the issue.
So you come after me saying my "credibility"(even though I'm not getting paid for anything
We knew it was bad so feel free to ignore it and belittle any poster discussing the issue.
You act as if we can add new players off the free agent list. But I'll let you worry your eyes out while I look at our first string doing what it was supposed to do versus a small school.
Our depth is what it is. It is going to cost us wins.
Since you knew it was a problem from the end of last season(like the rest of us) you can choose to ignore it and act like it doesnt exist if you want to. However acting as if posters shouldn't acknowledge it exist is ignorant.
Seriously can this type of offense win big and consistently in the SEC and the BCS. I know it worked at Cincy but here is my concern.I was digging some of the offensive sets myself. I'm a pro style guy, don't have much for the spread. But minus the QB in the shotgun, many of the sets were big boy football sets. Multiple TEs, we're coming at you, what ya gonna do about it type sets. Put the QB under center and I believe it would have been more noticeable. Some "Cutcliff" type formations. And although we ran a vanilla gameplan, I was very impressed with Bajakian as that's the first real taste we've gotten from him.
We may or may not have the "best staff in America" as CBJ alluded to in his initial press conference, but I don't hear the little snickers and snide remarks anymore. These damn dudes are for real! They are to be taken serious!
But I'm belittling posters. I don't know why you guys would whine about a problem that won't be fixed this year.
've never seen more fans complain about the second unit than I've seen on this board. I don't get it. Everyone knows most of those kids won't play. But folks are whining like we're depending on those kids.
No one is acting like depth concerns don't exist, Bruin. Some of us just choose not to complain about it all the time. Instead we focus on the positives of the games, like our QB going 11/13 with no INT's, the offense scoring on all 7 possessions in the 1st half, our defense shutting out the opponent, etc. You and others want to focus on the 3rd and 4th string depth issues. Sounds awesome but I'll pass.
Next week when UT wins by 20 some of us will talk about how great it was to see Worley make the right reads and complete some tough passes, how nice it was to see Neal and Lane run through those holes that our elite OL created and how the defense shut down Petrino's offense. And others will talk about how the 4th string CB gave up a late 4th Q TD and we only won by 20 instead of 27.
Florida ran it to two BCS championships. AtM is riding a similar style of offense to the top now. It's about getting the difference makers in this offense.
My only complaint is against BB posting that our 2nd team kids arent being counted on. That is completely ignorant to say.
You act as if we can add new players off the free agent list. But I'll let you worry your eyes out while I look at our first string doing what it was supposed to do versus a small school.
I'm still shaky on it. I'm probably WRONG but it seems that if you're down a few scores it would be difficult to come back if you don't throw down field. I didn't see enough of that.
My only complaint with you is your constant search to find a single word or sentence to focus on so you can develop an argument and run it into the ground.
2nd team kids will be counted on but not all at the same time. Just like every other team we play.
UGA just lost to Clemson partly due to costly penalties, lost their star CB to a season ending injury and were already thin on defense. I wonder what their message boards look like today? We won 45-0 and didn't have a single penalty or injury, a pretty good start to the season if you ask me.
Our passing game will progress but remember it was basic type of game. Just lineup and basically out physical AP. We will take shots but North has to show he can make the difficult catches on deep balls. He'll be the true deep threat. And against Florida I've got a feeling he'll see a lot of 1 on 1 coverage.
I'm still shaky on it. I'm probably WRONG but it seems that if you're down a few scores it would be difficult to come back if you don't throw down field. I didn't see enough of that.
