I like Gantz as a walk-on, but I definitely don't think we should offer him a full ride just to keep him away from OSU. There are at least 4 instate kickers next year who are better prospects than Gantz, IMO, and surely we didn't pass on the nation's No. 1 kicker (J. King) this year for a kid who accounted for just 15 points in his entire HS career?
Even w/o Gantz, I think we'll be OK on FGs and PATs with a combination of Palardy, Brodus, Bullock, plus a walk-on (Ault, already on the roster) or two (Calleja?). Hopefully this staff can help Palardy to improve, but he has hit 70% of his career FG attempts (75% last year). Brodus is 7 of 8 on FG attempts. Those two guys should suffice on FGs, and then let Bullock handle kickoffs and PATs if he appears capable.
IMO, if we extend an offer to Gantz this year we'll be kicking ourselves for having to turn down a better prospect (at any position) next February due to numbers.
Gantz was blown away by the facilities in Knoxville and intrigued by the idea of competing the starting place kicker job as a freshman in the fall. Tennessee is a beautiful school and a great academic institution, Gantz said. They have the third largest stadium in the country and play in the SEC. They have the best facilities in the country and the most trustworthy coaches I've met.
The Buckeyes are offering him a similar opportunity to compete for a starting spot this fall, but it would be as a punter.
Buckeyes wooing kicker
FWIW, the article above is incorrect: Gantz's punting average last year was 34.9 yards, up from just 30.6 yards his junior year.