ab333
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 133
- Likes
- 1
You might be right.
I just don't see that sort of implied authority surviving litigation, should the University not honor this supposed MOU (it would never reach that point). Typically with big organizations, be it businesses or government entities, authority is expressly delegated or otherwise their is no authority. Remember UT is basically a branch of the government. If boosters could operate with implied authority, why couldn't some local entity usurp the local government with the same sort of authority (being that the entity knew, but did not stop their actions)?
Don't get me wrong, I have bought into this whole idea but the one part of the story that has me calling BS is the idea that the boosters negotiated and signed an MOU with Gruden or his agent. I mean it is possible, but there is no way it would be binding after a breach. I guess that is a moot and academic point, but it happens to be the type of stuff I waste my time thinking about.
Feralhog@hogville: "don' shoot the messanger . . I'm hearing that the Gruden rumors are about to be put to bed."
don' shoot the messanger . .
They are also saying Gruden is on campus.....
Gruden's in Fayetteville and they may announce today. I know it was too good to be true. Bring on Kirby Smart!!!
Kirby Mart will be a legend here
Sounds to me like UT better honor our end of the MOU and give Gruden the Keys to the Hill :good!:
These boosters are different. Plus, there is no doubt in my mind that Hart (as well as others in the AD) has seen the various drafts of the MOU and okayed the final draft before it was signed. All of these things would work against UT.
I agree it is a moot point though. MAybe a law professor will put it on a contracts exam?
I like Stoops a lot, but I will take Gruden all day long before any other candidate (even Saban if that was an option).
I like Stoops a lot, but I will take Gruden all day long before any other candidate (even Saban if that was an option).
Me too. Although I booked it.
Right now Saban is the gold standard, and I have no doubt that he could do at UT what he did at both Bama and LSU. I really like Gruden's upside, but compared to Saban it would be a gamble to hire Gruden if both were in play (and admittedly they aren't). Gruden might prove to be superior to Saban, but that would take 3 national championships before that conversation could be given real weight.