Official Jon Gruden Thread IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Boro

Not sure you saw it last night but i got word from 2 different very well known names that backed up your info. With that said I am not on a witch hunt by asking this just trying to figure out if all these very connected people may be fooled here.

I asked this earlier but it wasn't answered or I missed it

Was the scheduled recruiting test after November 1st a big part of the info you received?

As I stated earlier It is probably not relevant but if anybody is hanging their hat on that info it's not creditable IMO.

I have been lurking and watching. The intel I have been getting is pretty close to what this Boro cat has been saying. The situation is fluid and tenuous at the moment. Everyone needs to chill a little and see what happens. My info comes from within the AD. I am not going to get into a penis measuring contest with people that want sources. The reason I don't say too much is because of the way some of you turn on people when it is not exactly what you want to hear.

I could not care less about e credit or whatever the hell it is you call it. I just want us back on track.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
No. The mods confirmed they didn't have the same email.

The mods confirmed that based on all the information we have access to, we don't believe them to be the same person.

If you have some proof otherwise, send it to me. Until then, let's please stop derailing multiple threads with this issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
I have been lurking and watching. The intel I have been getting is pretty close to what this Boro cat has been saying. The situation is fluid and tenuous at the moment. Everyone needs to chill a little and see what happens. My info comes from within the AD. I am not going to get into a penis measuring contest with people that want sources. The reason I don't say too much is because of the way some of you turn on people when it is not exactly what you want to hear.

I could not care less about e credit or whatever the hell it is you call it. I just want us back on track.

I am with you. Until last night I was measuring every thing suspecting strongly that it was a sham, but I got word late last night that confirmed alot here. Today I have gotten more but that doesn't mean all these "connected" people arent all getting fooled.
 
But why wait till he takes it? It cannot be that hard. A guy who has coached complex football schemes, i dont see failing a recruiting test.

It's just a formality with the NCAA that is a documentation that the coach is aware of the possible infractions they could be dealing with if caught cheating.
 
I suspected the test was very insignificant concening the timeline as it should be. The test is really a joke to be honest.

It was insignificant in the scheme if things, but was part of the process before the announcement. The information could have been left out and the timeline would have been the same.
 
lol at this point im trusting the guys that have said to have sources and that their stories are syncing. im just wanting to see Dooley gone. tomorrow. yesterday, but in reality, tomorrow.
 
But why wait till he takes it? It cannot be that hard. A guy who has coached complex football schemes, i dont see failing a recruiting test.

He would have to wait until it was administered by the athletic department before he could take it but in no way would it hinder the timing of his hiring. As I have said it takes a lot of coaches less than 10 min to take
 
It was insignificant in the scheme if things, but was part of the process before the announcement. The information could have been left out and the timeline would have been the same.

Agreed. The test has absolutely nothing to do with the timeline.
 
The mods confirmed that based on all the information we have access to, we don't believe them to be the same person.

If you have some proof otherwise, send it to me. Until then, let's please stop derailing multiple threads with this issue.

So him stirring constant rumors is ok but "derailing" isn't?

This is a good board and allowing him to post like he does is not good business. He's acted this way for entriely too long now. If you disagree with what I've said then please ban me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The mods confirmed that based on all the information we have access to, we don't believe them to be the same person.

If you have some proof otherwise, send it to me. Until then, let's please stop derailing multiple threads with this issue.

This is our thread!
The inmates now run the asylum!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 284
So him stirring constant rumors is ok but "derailing" isn't?

This is a good board and allowing him to post like he does is not good business. He's acted this way for entriely too long now. If you disagree with what I've said then please ban me.

Lol see ya.
 
I am with you. Until last night I was measuring every thing suspecting strongly that it was a sham, but I got word late last night that confirmed alot here. Today I have gotten more but that doesn't mean all these "connected" people arent all getting fooled.

The info could have sprung from a common source and be getting slightly modified by those repeating it. However, what I am getting is from people that would know and my relationship with them is such that they would not knowingly lie to me. What I am saying is I think it is very close to what may want but the timing is not what is wanted. The problem is it is like a fire starting with a little ember, if the slightest thing goes wrong, poof it is over.
 
So him stirring constant rumors is ok but "derailing" isn't?

This is a good board and allowing him to post like he does is not good business. He's acted this way for entriely too long now. If you disagree with what I've said then please ban me.

very valid point. ive never understood some of the stuf that is allowed on this site vs. stuf that gets nixed, unless drama = more posting = more site traffic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top