Yeah. They pretty much do. You may be determined to close your eyes but rational people including coaching candidates who might otherwise have been interested aren't.
Are you really and truly that delusional? Seriously? And the amazing part is that you really don't have to be. Coaches fail and get replaced. But most new coaches do NOT inherit a team comprised of the remnants of three consecutive total bust recruiting classes. Go back and look for yourself.
2007- bust. Only 3 guys from that class who should have made up Dooley's SR group in his first year made a significant contribution and one of those guys never actually lived up to billing (Walker).
2008- bust before it even started. There were 4 4* players- Abrams-Ward, Douglas, Walls, and G Willams. Only Walls was around to make a contribution when Dooley arrived. Five of the 3* have contributed.
2009- total bust. This should be the Sr core of this year's team. Gordon and Teague are the only 4/5* players left from that class. Neither helped in '10. Both were shakey in '11 and still are. The only 3* to have made any contribution so far are Z Rogers and Hood.
So in summary, the "best" contribution by his predecessors to Dooley's rebuilding effort was 6 guys from a 35th ranked recruiting class.
No. Because it had a MAC level roster at best.
Your ignorance is profound.
Yeah. Never mind that the team actually became YOUNGER in his second year and ended up playing both BCS title contenders and both SEC CG contenders. What do you think was left of UT's thin roster at that point? One of their two best offensive players was playing with a broken hand. The other was playing with a recently broken thumb and a 102 temperature.
No. It is because of the 3 failed recruiting classes from 07 to 09.