MNF: Green Bay vs. Seattle

#152
#152
tumscalcium said:
Knock it down knock it down knock it down. It's what you're always taught. Had he knocked it down game over. Packers win. Bug he tried padding the stats and paid.
Click to expand...

You keep saying this as though it matters. He made the wrong play, agreed. It was still an interception.
 
#157
#157
what's crazy too is how many of the players were making contact with the refs at the end of the play. One of them flipped one's hat off!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#162
#162
Down by 1 point in my FF league. I have Rodgers and the Pack defense.......the pick would have given me the win...instead I lose by 4
 
#163
#163
tumscalcium said:
A Super Bowl over a Monday night game that wasn't nearly as controversial? Doubt it. Seahawks fans can still gripe.
Click to expand...

Agree in principle but Seattle fans magnify that one offense into refs hating them the way Vols think ESPN hates them.

It was one really bad game for them.
 
#166
#166
Vol_Maul said:
I question your neutrality. Your stake in this is to be right in an internet argument. That is not a neutral position.
Click to expand...

Lol. I just don't understand the "Clearly intercepted" bit. It wasn't. Football is a grown mans game. If he wanted the ball and it was do clearly against his chest and had all the control and blah blah then Jennings would have come out with the ball easily, but Tate had it. People are griping over a 1/100 second of a possession first. It wasn't clearly Jennings ball. He'll, I'm a Cowboys fan. Seattle ain't exactly on my list of favorite teams.

Tate also had two hands on it, not just one.
 
Last edited:
#169
#169
tumscalcium said:
Lol. I just don't understand the "Clearly intercepted" bit. It wasn't. Football is a grown mans game. If he wanted the ball and it was do clearly against his chest and had all the control and blah blah then Jennings would have come out with the ball easily, but Tate had it. People are griping over a 1/100 second of a possession first. It wasn't clearly Jennings ball. He'll, I'm a Cowboys fan. Seattle ain't exactly on my list of favorite teams.
Click to expand...

Tate never possessed that ball at any time and it wasnt simultaneously caught. Arguing this fact is just stupid
 
#170
#170
Jennings landed on his back. Even if Tate had two hands on the ball he was clearly not in possession. Horrible call.
 
#171
#171
BearCat204 said:
Tate never possessed that ball at any time and it wasnt simultaneously caught. Arguing this fact is just stupid
Click to expand...

Again, wrong. To say Tate never had any sort of possession is simply ridiculous. He had hands on it the whole time and even came out with it. (I know it's not like a fumble) but if Zjennings had it then he'd have easily come out with it.
 
#173
#173
tumscalcium said:
Again, wrong. To say Tate never had any sort of possession is simply ridiculous. He had hands on it the whole time and even came out with it. (I know it's not like a fumble) but if Zjennings had it then he'd have easily come out with it.
Click to expand...

Lol seriously?
 
#174
#174
You have to control the ball to the ground - only Jennings did that - it was not simultaneous. It is no catch or possession until the player is down or hits the ground and makes a "football" move.
 
#175
#175
tumscalcium said:
Again, wrong. To say Tate never had any sort of possession is simply ridiculous. He had hands on it the whole time and even came out with it. (I know it's not like a fumble) but if Zjennings had it then he'd have easily come out with it.
Click to expand...
no, just no.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top