We haven't had a LB with a mean streak like his in a long time. He wants to hurt people. That alone makes me want him. Plus we aren't super deep at LB. Especially running a 3-4 base defense.
I disagree with anyone who says we don't need or want him. Dooley and Sunseri both love the guy.
That being said... we'll replace him with a DL (Briscoe) and we still have Peters who will also be a MLB so it won't make or break us. I will agree with that much.
The intangibles make him more attractive. Maybe he is athletically unique for his size, but I don't think he is exactly elite.
You'll prolly see some 3-4 looks. I doubt they will try and completely overhaul the D in one year.
Can't believe I just read several more pages of people trying to justify not getting Santos on NSD. Anyone who thinks we can compensate for losing him is in denial. F a "solid" DT or a "solid" RB. We need to keep Santos.
At any rate, this whole debacle that has unfolded over the last 10 pages is stupid. Let's just wait until Wednesday or the weekend to make more concrete conclusions.
3-4 will be our base defense, just like Alabama. But they are in a 4-3 and 5 man fronts alot too.
"Multiple" has been the term Dooley is using. But we are going from a 4-3 to a 3-4 "base" defense.
