That's just complete ignorance. The only teams on that list less talented than us were: 1996 Memphis, 2004 Notre Dame, 2005 Vanderbilt, 2005 South Carolina, 2008 UCLA and 2008 Wyoming. That's a whopping 6 losses over 9 seasons to less talented teams. Only 2 of those losses are bad losses -- Memphis in 1996 and Wyoming after he was fired in 2008. That rate of bad losses is one of the lowest in the SEC over that time period.
we've all heard your spiel on the '01 LSU team. I'll grant that the '00 Florida team was talented, but when you have Travis Henry running for about 700 yards in the first half, you shouldn't lose, especially not in the way we did.
2001 Georgia, 2003 Auburn, 2007 Alabama, and 2008 Auburn, on the other hand:
*2001 Georgia is an 8-4 team with losses to Auburn and Boston College going up against one of the best Tennessee teams in my lifetime.
*2003 Auburn went 7-5. They lost to Georgia Tech, and we were the only ranked team they beat all year.
*2007 Alabama went 7-6, complete with losses to Louisiana-Monroe and Sylvester Croom. They were playing a UT team that won the East.
*2008 Auburn had no business beating anybody. We were their only win in their last eight games against FCS opponents. Opponents that included Vanderbilt and a 5-7 Arkansas team. Their lone road win was 3-2 against the worst team in the conference. That team might've lost to Wyoming.
And I didn't include 2008 South Carolina on the original list, but if it isn't, it just shows how bad our talent had become.