He's had 7 receivers drafted in the last 6 drafts and is about to add to that total with Brazzell (and possibly former receive squirrel white), so his "damaging" system is not completely deterring NFL teams. In fact, according to our AI overlords, only Ohio State with Hartline/Day (11), Alabama with Saban/DeBoer (11-13) and Brian Kelly (LSU/ND) (9-10) have exceeded Heupel's total since he has been a head coach.Why are our receivers hurt by Heupel’s system while the CB’s are not hurt by Banks’s system?
I personally think it’s a bunch of nothing. We’ve always had receivers who got drafted pretty high who didn’t work out in the NFL.He's had 7 receivers drafted in the last 6 drafts and is about to add to that total with Brazzell (and possibly former receive squirrel white), so his "damaging" system is not completely deterring NFL teams. In fact, according to our AI overlords, only Ohio State with Hartline/Day (11), Alabama with Saban/DeBoer (11-13) and Brian Kelly (LSU/ND) (9-10) have exceeded Heupel's total since he has been a head coach.
I think all of those programs have had superior recruited talent to work with.
To save anyone from having to click or those at work who can’t access X. Hood was projected at 14.
View attachment 826990
That’s an entirely different argument. I just pointed out that the system for CB’s specifically, translates to the NFL. He was heavy man coverage on the outside with guys like McCoy, Gibson, Hood & Ty. The 2 that excelled are likely first round picks, because the system showcased their talents. Ricky isn’t as good as McCoy & Hood but he still was considered a quality CB. Ty is going to probably end up better than all of them and his size will put his draft stock through the roof. He has 1 full season of film as a true freshman showcasing that skill set in a man scheme.Did he also give up the run and QB spy to prevent big pass plays? I thought Banks’s defense was overly friendly to pass coverage.
