The conference title games turned meaningless when they expanded the playoff. For almost 10 years, you had a 5 conferences and a G5 playing for 4 spots. It was beautiful. They expanded by too much. A 3 loss team shouldn’t be in contention for a playoff spot. Should have expanded to 6 with byes or 8 and no byes. 10-12 team playoff neutered conference title games
Originally, they wanted a way to get all of the P5 teams in the mix and also satisfy a G5 team that was undefeated and maybe good. Then the conferences expanded, and it became P4 and the G5. They could easily now connect back to the championship games for the P4 conferences .... yes, make the teams win their conference, give the top 2 a bye and have two teams at large - one for a G5 Team and one for the top ranked team that did not win their championship. That allows an independent like ND a spot.
Folks would still argue but at least the selection is objective and pushes the conference championship games back to the forefront.
Does it end up with the teams that folks may think are the best - no - but it does put the value back on a team winning their conference.
If they did that this year the following would be in as conference champs - and NO ONE would like it at all.
- Indiana
- Georgia
- Texas Tech
- Duke
And this would be the other two teams.
- Tulane (G5)
- Ohio State (highest rank)
The bowl games then have good matchups again and championship games matter. You could probably add two more and still ensure you got the "best" when you had a Duke happen.
But my bet is that rather than backing up we will go to 14 or 16 next year - making this worse rather than better. Now teams are trying to avoid a 4 loss as 3 loss teams will get in.