Three pointers percentage NCAA team rankings

#51
#51
Eloquent.

I see alot of “sticky” where rather than pass and generate motion off ball, we spend way too much time on the perimeter dribbling. Nothing is sweeter than seeing the ball swing three or four quick passes for a bucket, be it at the arc or inside. It seems we are assist averse
Barker is guilty of this, and being tall her handle is easy to exploit when she spends too long dribbling. Cooper was guilty of that last year but seems to be much better this year.

We also drive into the paint too often without passing it back out when nothing is there. Players need to do a better job of presenting themselves to the driver as the defense is drawn to the person with the ball. Too often we just put our heads down and don't look up until we are stuck with no one flashing open for relief, or we force up a bad shot without even looking for an outlet. The kick back out is where you get your more high percentage threes. And we should be able to sneak behind the defense more since they are swarming whoever drives in. But no one cuts, and no one looks for them.

Rebounding is another sore spot. I was pointing out to my daughter how Pauldo is the only player who seems to consistently get good rebound position. She is just too short to get the numbers her positioning should earn from her effort. Latham seems to fight for position as well. The rest are very inconsistent and some of it is from not knowing when to crash the boards because no one knows when a shot is coming. A Horston like rebounder would do this team a world of good.

I don't think our shot selection is always that bad. I think we are just overanxious a lot. You know that panicked look horses get where their eyes almost roll? One of our players had that at the free throw line early in the game. Then later she was settled down. Kim was obviously wound tight as well and I think she needs to exude what the team needs to see rather than reflect what it feels sometimes. If not her then someone needs to lead on the emotional front. That might come when roles are better defined.
 
#52
#52
Were going to start winning a lot of games if the shooting percentages go up. You need to have to great a separation in shots attempted to win games shooting 40 percent. A ten shot separation shooting 45 percent and no separation of foul shot attempts given you get 70 attempts to their 60 makes them need to shoot 53 percent to win the game. If you ever shoot 50 percent in that scenario then they have to reach 60 percent.
Our definite problem right now is shooting the ball. I see this month where we only have three games on the schedule as the time where we should take a huge step forward. We should be able to define much better shot selection and also should be able to better perfect our team defensively.

I think it is a huge month for us to get a lot better and improve our chances for a top four finish in the SEC even with our horrid SEC road schedule.
 
#53
#53
Yes, if you are only looking at the results of shot attempts rather than possessions. And I felt admit the article I cited seems, from what we can tell, to be talking about individual shots for individual players, although in not 100% sure of that.

But, from a what helps the team win standpoint, it may be different. For example, if the team rebounds 40% of 3pa but only 15% of 2pa, then the analysis changes. Plus there's the effect on pace of the game if you run a lot of clock on a lot of possession trying to get a shot at the rim. Plus turnovers on entry passes. And maybe other things. It gets complicated. Moneyball was not obvious. That's why it was powerful.

All that said, the most exciting thing is that this seems to be helping our players get better. I just love that. The boost for Talaysia I is so cool given how good she already was!
I really hate posting something from AI, but my research could only find this entry. It suggests close shots are the easiest to rebound, three-pointers are harder due to the weird bounces, and longish mid-range jumpers are the worst. It kind of makes sense, though it really could matter if the team is guard oriented like ours or it plays through dominant bigs like many of Pat's and Dawn's teams. Put it this way, people like Angel, Glory, and Boston could easily rebound their own missed shots but probably hardly ever get three-point shot rebounds, whereas some quick guard who are already away from the goal can probably track the three-point ball off the rim and be able to get to it. I would love to see the actual stats for our team.
Google Search
 
#54
#54
Put it this way, people like Angel, Glory, and Boston could easily rebound their own missed shots but probably hardly ever get three-point shot rebounds, whereas some quick guard who are already away from the goal can probably track the three-point ball off the rim and be able to get to it.
That makes a lot of sense to me.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top