No Kings

Speaking of kings, you really are the king of projection. So much of the drivel you come out with is not even worth responding to it's so inane.

If Trump changed the Republican party for the worse, how would you describe what has become of the Democrat party in the last ten years? To support a party with an agenda that includes burning down cities, drag queens in schools, wide open borders, canceling anyone who opposes your viewpoint, and medical mandates including for children, among other wholesome things, is far beyond mindless.

Just to fill you in what you are dealing with Luther thinks a face diaper is going to stop him from getting a cold.
 
So you're fine for people to be refused treatment for lack of funds and go die on the street if no donation is available? That works some places but I hope we're better.

But that is exactly what is eventually going to happen anyway i.e. collapse.

You ran out of money long ago.
 
What are you referring to? Yeah, I don't remember the "experts" saying anything about the 2000 bubble or the 2008 bubble, so yes many might have missed something.

If we were discussing the AI bubble, this would be a worthy response.

The discussion at hand is in regards to Trump's unprecedented macro geopolitical moves in terms if trade.
 
Speaking of marriage, it's interesting that.....
The states with the highest divorce rates are all red.
The states with the lowest divorce rates are all blue.
The states where the average age of first marriage is lowest are red.
The states where the average age of first marriage is highest are blue.


They must all keep invading the red states just to get divorced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc
Trump's a wannabe king. Biden was too but Trump's taking it further.
I think just about anyone running for POTUS has a ruler complex. That's why it's so common to hear the old "Wanting to be POTUS should be reason enough for that person not to be POTUS." bit. I don't think anyone that's been in a high federal office for any significant length of time isn't compromised. (and please note the inclusiveness in that statement)
 
If we were discussing the AI bubble, this would be a worthy response.

The discussion at hand is in regards to Trump's unprecedented macro geopolitical moves in terms if trade.

The same thing applies, throwing out "experts" is literally not a discussion. Bring the expert to discuss.
 
Speaking of marriage, it's interesting that.....
The states with the highest divorce rates are all red.
The states with the lowest divorce rates are all blue.
The states where the average age of first marriage is lowest are red.
The states where the average age of first marriage is highest are blue.

More shacking up for the win!!!!
 
So you're fine for people to be refused treatment for lack of funds and go die on the street if no donation is available? That works some places but I hope we're better.
That's an impressive leap. Please review our convo and observe you have asked about both chronic and non life threatening conditions.

Hard enough to discuss in good faith when genuine. I find what you did here to be really disingenuous. May not be intentional on your part.
 
He trots out the "uniparty" nonsense whenever Republicans are doing something he doesn't like, then flops back to blanket support shortly thereafter.

I don't vote. Most people were not satisfied with what the Republican party was doing so they hired a Democrat. I would say most people that voted for Trump would strongly agree.
 
I think just about anyone running for POTUS has a ruler complex. That's why it's so common to hear the old "Wanting to be POTUS should be reason enough for that person not to be POTUS." bit. I don't think anyone that's been in a high federal office for any significant length of time isn't compromised. (and please note the inclusiveness in that statement)
That's valid. I guess we have to go back to Ford, maybe Carter, to find one that wasn't like that. But it's been getting a lot worse lately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hndog609
That's an impressive leap. Please review our convo and observe you have asked about both chronic and non life threatening conditions.

Hard enough to discuss in good faith when genuine. I find what you did here to be really disingenuous. May not be intentional on your part.
If charity isn't available and a poor has a life threatening condition, what's the plan?
It's not at all disingenuous.
 
As opposed to your usual bouquet of contribution.

I usually get straight to the point which can rub people the wrong way, but most of the big big financial problems are not going to be addressed or solved, and definitely not by the people here. (and I usually get to the point pretty quick as to the why)
 
It is a useless stat. I don’t know many infants that have gotten divorced.
1760980092142.png

 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Advertisement

Back
Top