Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

The House committee GOP leadership said for some time that the documents would be released, but what is getting released is stuff they got from the Estate. The administration continues to block release of the DOJ documents, with Johnson and other GOP members now complicit in the cover up.
 
The House committee GOP leadership said for some time that the documents would be released, but what is getting released is stuff they got from the Estate. The administration continues to block release of the DOJ documents, with Johnson and other GOP members now complicit in the cover up.
My God man do you think about anything other than Trump 24/7..
 
pretty sure she was put in jail before Trump was president. or at least before Trump was seriously brought up.

I think its a hard coincidence to ignore that as soon as Trump's name is seriously floated around with Epstein; she is suddenly put in a nicer prison after she says nice things for Trump.

if Trump had NOTHING to hide from, why is she in a nicer prison now than she was?
If Trump has ANYTHING to hide from, why didn't you bring it up when you held the reins of power?

The wheels of the bus go round and round...

I'll tell you one reason which I have zero doubt you won't consider: Trump isn't nearly as vindictive as ya'll paint him to be. To wit: Why didn't he have Hillary investigated or brought up on charges for the mail fiasco? There is ZERO doubt she could be locked up for that. ZERO. She violated communications security laws that land military people in prison. She removed evidence. And then there was SENATOR Joe Biden who filled his garage with Secret material. ZERO authority to have ANY of that in his possession. None. Nada.
 
I haven't either, but she was sentenced in 2022 while the Biden admin was in charge... simply put it doesn't make sense for her not to disclose any info against trump then only to get a better place to serve her sentence??? Especially if anything she had could have brought even more charged against Trump,??? Which is a more logical to you??
Well we will see when the next Democrat president in 2037 or so puts her back in GenPop at some **** hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
If Trump has ANYTHING to hide from, why didn't you bring it up when you held the reins of power?

The wheels of the bus go round and round...

I'll tell you one reason which I have zero doubt you won't consider: Trump isn't nearly as vindictive as ya'll paint him to be. To wit: Why didn't he have Hillary investigated or brought up on charges for the mail fiasco? There is ZERO doubt she could be locked up for that. ZERO. She violated communications security laws that land military people in prison. She removed evidence. And then there was SENATOR Joe Biden who filled his garage with Secret material. ZERO authority to have ANY of that in his possession. None. Nada.
because Trump cares about #1. he knows they're untouchables, he was one who supported Hillary, right up until he didn't. he knows DC doesn't want someone rocking the boat. being part of that machine he knows how much he can rock it.

its why Trump has remained silent on Epstein, but his followers and supporters at every turn were bringing up Epstein. It was plausible deniability.

and like most politicians he knows its better to have a talking point, Lock Her Up!, that you can continuously campaign on, rather than actually doing it. Trump locks her up and...what? Trump doesn't lock her up, and continues to rant about it, and he can get his supporters to throw money at him.

Trump is just as swampy as the rest of DC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
New emails from Epstein discussing Trump...from after their purported bromance ending. Suggests Trump may have been interviewed during the initial investigation

 
New emails from Epstein discussing Trump...from after their purported bromance ending. Suggests Trump may have been interviewed during the initial investigation


at least in that image they weren't discussing Trump. do you have a better example that would link Trump to that?
 
It's a thread of tweets
and you chose one that did not support the claim you made.

you could have just admitted you had the wrong tweet, and moved on to see how that tweet is still harmful to Trump, just not in the way you claimed.

This is why I don't get you guys. you will go out of your way to twist and make up something, and will walk right over the legit critiques.
 
New emails from Epstein discussing Trump...from after their purported bromance ending. Suggests Trump may have been interviewed during the initial investigation


Go get your red nose


"Except for three minor instances, the emails do not mention President Donald Trump, who has said that his friendship with Epstein ended before Epstein was charged with sex crimes."

 
Go get your red nose


"Except for three minor instances, the emails do not mention President Donald Trump, who has said that his friendship with Epstein ended before Epstein was charged with sex crimes."

Why would Maxwell assume investigators wanted to talk to Trump if Trump didn't know anything about the sex with kids?

 
Why would Maxwell assume investigators wanted to talk to Trump if Trump didn't know anything about the sex with kids?


because for a while Trump and Epstein were friends. at the time they wouldn't have known about Trump's claim to not know about the pedophilia. and even if they did its their job to investigate and not just to trust someone because they said something.

jeez dude. you would think a lawyer would know this. at least turn on a crime drama or something.
 
New emails from Epstein discussing Trump...from after their purported bromance ending. Suggests Trump may have been interviewed during the initial investigation



LOL

Over thousands of emails Bloomberg reviewed, Trumps name came up 3 times and the interview you suggest was with reporters.
 
because for a while Trump and Epstein were friends. at the time they wouldn't have known about Trump's claim to not know about the pedophilia. and even if they did its their job to investigate and not just to trust someone because they said something.

jeez dude. you would think a lawyer would know this. at least turn on a crime drama or something.
And a mobster would likely think the police went to talk to members of his crew.
 
And a mobster would likely think the police went to talk to members of his crew.
assuming you meant mobster.

but yeah, also anyone they had done business with, legal or otherwise. any witnesses, or potential witnesses. any victims. anyone who really knew the suspect.

wouldn't the investigators talking to Trump, assuming he was part of the "crew", at least twice, and not finding anything about Trump to investigate further clear Trump even more?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top