Of course, World Exposure could've written that headline based purely on the percentages, without a lick of evidence, then come back with a follow up story on how (if we only got 1 or 2) CKC failed, then write a question piece that asks "Has the Tennessee recruiting staff lost their touch?"
For World Exposure, it's a win/win gamble. Newspapers were using those tricks
literally a hundred years ago.
------
"Hey, World Exposure, let's make that bet more interesting. If your headline proves to have been unsubstantiated, you change your name to "World X-Poseur" for a month."