Buddy’s Bandit
Tennessean by the Grace of God
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2017
- Messages
- 5,155
- Likes
- 18,441
But you agree tht the jobs market are a part of the calculus.The GDP, OBBBA inflationary fiscal policies, wage growth, uncertainty,and core CPI near 3 all supports no decrease in interest rate.
The jobs number by itself does support some easing but there are a lot of factors that dont support it...
The actual data is a fact. It was higher in the fall to help the Democrats in the election and higher in the summer to help the fed validate their decision to maintain the rates. Fact. As stated above, it is part of the equation.Yep that’s what you’re saying. We can see it. The actual data just isn’t helping you sell it. To me anyway.
But you agree tht the jobs market are a part of the calculus.
Mojo already pointed out the data timeline. I am pretty sure you were talking final numbers after two revisions. Which had not occurred yet at the time of the election. As you said the actual data is a fact!The actual data is a fact. It was higher in the fall to help the Democrats in the election and higher in the summer to help the fed validate their decision to maintain the rates. Fact. As stated above, it is part of the equation.
BLS October 2024 (Released right before election) dropped a super low job number, revised down August and September.
The super low October 2024 number was subsequently revised upward in both months after the election.
The Sept 2024 number was revised down too much in October as it was somewhat back up after the election.
This kinda kills that narrative you are trying to spin...
”Actual Data” refers to the data that is available at that point. Not the net data. Hence it was done with political malice intent Because it impacted decision before the net numbers came out. That is certainly what it appears. Pluse she was an Obama appointee with a dislike of President Trump. In other words, she is part of the Swamp.Well actually mojo said it. Is he wrong?
”Actual Data” refers to the data that is available at that point. Not the net data. Hence it was done with political malice intent Because it impacted decision before the net numbers came out. That is certainly what it appears. Pluse she was an Obama appointee with a dislike of President Trump. In other words, she is part of the Swamp.
Well then it would appear the whole premise of your argument is wrong based on the initial release and update timeline that was replied back to you with”Actual Data” refers to the data that is available at that point. Not the net data. Hence it was done with political malice intent Because it impacted decision before the net numbers came out. That is certainly what it appears. Pluse she was an Obama appointee with a dislike of President Trump. In other words, she is part of the Swamp.
The streets lined say otherwise.Scottish MP Says Trump Not Welcome: ‘This Country Has No Place for Epstein’s Associates’
![]()
Scottish MP Says Trump Not Welcome: ‘This Country Has No Place for Epstein’s Associates’ - Toolzo
Scottish Government , CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons Donald Trump’s arrival in Scotland this week was anything but quiet. Gr...www.toolzo.online