Trump Ignores the Courts

Ah…..
Of course ignoring the legal requirement that asylum must be claimed in the First Nation an immigrant teaches.


Very important point.

Majority of these illegal folks are NOT from Mexico. So they crossed at LEAST 1 entire country (Mexico) without claiming asylum from whatever allegedly deadly threats they faced in their country of origin. Many of them cross 2, 3, 4 countries to get to the US. This isnt about asylum...and as usual the Leftists know this obvious fact. Its about importing future voters they believe will vote Dimwit. Nothing more.

Fwiw...there has been no change here in the Charlotte area among the 300+ amigos that work for my subcontractors. Business as usual. It seems the criminals and gang members are being targeted. As they should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Literally nothing has come to light. Their families said they’re innocent. That’s not some breaking news. Your Maryland Father’s family said the same thing. When the evidence came out, it was obvious to everyone that was a lie.
Who was the Maryland father?
 
The MS-13 member who beat his wife. Kilmer Abrego Garcia maybe?

*regularly.

Who regularly beat his wife. Police called on him by her like a half dozen times, protection order etc. So of course when he gets deported, Democrat members of Congress fly to South America trying to "champion" him and get him returned to the US.

The term "Maryland Father" comes from the spin that the Dimwits and MSM reporters tried tirelessly to put on him...saying he was just good ole dad from Maryland that mean old Trump deported. Turns out he was a repeat offender wife beater, documented gang ties, and IIRC was also involved in drug sales/firearms. Real stand up guy. The truth in the matter actually being that he is EXACTLY who we should be targeting 1st for deportation. Known gang member, known criminal committing new crimes AFTER illegally entering the country. Good riddance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188

Despite all the apocalyptic rhetoric, there’s no doubt that the left’s current position on nationwide injunctions is purely political—and Justice Elena Kagan accidentally proved it.

How? Well, Justice Kagan, who dissented in this case, was singing a very different tune just a couple of years ago. Back in 2022, when President Biden was in the White House and conservatives were the ones seeking relief from his executive orders, Kagan was openly skeptical of nationwide injunctions.




Clown
 

Despite all the apocalyptic rhetoric, there’s no doubt that the left’s current position on nationwide injunctions is purely political—and Justice Elena Kagan accidentally proved it.

How? Well, Justice Kagan, who dissented in this case, was singing a very different tune just a couple of years ago. Back in 2022, when President Biden was in the White House and conservatives were the ones seeking relief from his executive orders, Kagan was openly skeptical of nationwide injunctions.




Clown

but no hackery from the side who were claiming nationwide injunctions were good, but are now bad?
 
I don't either. but one side can't say the sky is blue without the other saying its a different color.
True. If Kagan was saying she thought they were terrible, there was certainly someone else in the Legislature saying they were great.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top