Iran

[rekinhavoc]

How is Iran so sure the facilities are intact if they evacuated them? I would imagine they are still burning.

If they were not destroyed why not let the US believe they were? They are basically inviting follow up strikes.

 

[Majors]

Yeah that’s what I said .

You’re zig zagging on two different strikes. They did promote sending planes to Guam, so there’s that. Keep your head on a swivel moving forward.

 

[ButchPlz]

You obviously can't read, and still haven't taken the time to address my post that you quoted. You are clearly upset this morning. Take some time to relax. Reacquire your reading comprehension and come back to try again.

Why are you asking me to contribute to a post that said... literally nothing of value, but accused people of being "anti-American"?

Operational security and intel alignment in this administration has apparently never been an actual concern before now, so it's bizzare that someone that's on board with this thinks that's something to consider now, especially when it comes to initiating war actions around the globe. It's so awful and "anti-American" that the people that are actually going to bear the costs of these idiotic decisions for the next several decades (i.e., me, and not you) should have a say.

 

[sonofUT62]

Zero dems can be trusted. Only a few republicans can be trusted. Congress as a whole cannot be trusted with information like this. There is a 110% chance the info will be leaked.

So since Gabbard was previously a Democrat in Congress she ABSOLUTELY can’t be trusted? And since Vance and Rubio were recently in Congress…but as Republicans…they probably can’t be trusted…but maybe they can?? I’m just trying to lay this out for you in writing so you see how silly it looks.

 

[ButchPlz]

So since Gabbard was previously a Democrat in Congress she ABSOLUTELY can’t be trusted? And since Vance and Rubio were recently in Congress…but as Republicans…they probably can’t be trusted…but maybe they can?? I’m just trying to lay this out for you in writing so you see how silly it looks.

Massie is a good dude, but he can't be trusted. Only the shining knight Ted Cruz, who can't answer basic questions about anything, is worth our devotion and trust.

 

[just bob]

Massie is a good dude, but he can't be trusted. Only the shining knight Ted Cruz, who can't answer basic questions about anything, is worth our devotion and trust.

Negative, Massie is a good dude and he clearly doesn't like this decision. He is not anti-American though. Good lord learn to read.

 

[sonofUT62]

You’re zig zagging on two different strikes. They did promote sending planes to Guam, so there’s that. Keep your head on a swivel moving forward.

You misrepresent something I say in an effort to promote your massive Trump can do no wrong bias, but I should keep my head on a swivel?? How about turning yours away from Trumps butt for a second?

 

[just bob]

So since Gabbard was previously a Democrat in Congress she ABSOLUTELY can’t be trusted? And since Vance and Rubio were recently in Congress…but as Republicans…they probably can’t be trusted…but maybe they can?? I’m just trying to lay this out for you in writing so you see how silly it looks.

None of those things addressed what I said.

 

[ButchPlz]

None of those things addressed what I said.

The entire post addressed what you said. Just saying stuff doesn't address what you said because you don't understand it doesn't make it so.

This demonstration of density is how we normal people keep getting bled dry in this country- and our fellows keep voting for it.

 

[just bob]

What about Fetterman?

I know he supported this. What about him? Does he need to send himself to a mental hospital?

 

[volbeast33]

Not to mention Trump's own intelligence head is either totally incompetent (which I doubt) or is the one actually telling the truth about things while Trump blathers on like an unhinged moron while ordering strikes.

Taking words out of the equation. What actions has Trump done that's been unhinged? He has ordered a few different strikes during his time as President but has generally tried to keep us out of conflicts.

 

[just bob]

The entire post addressed what you said. Just saying stuff doesn't address what you said because you don't understand it doesn't make it so.

This demonstration of density is how we normal people keep getting bled dry in this country- and our fellows keep voting for it.

No it did not.

Before you try sweeping your ignorance under the rug go back and address the original post you've lied about.

 

[sonofUT62]

None of those things addressed what I said.

And your response doesn’t address my question. If Congress in general and Dems in particular can’t be trusted….how can Gabbard be trusted? You know that members of Congress take the same oath that your trusted members of Trumps security team took…right before they accidentally included a reporter on a group chat. Has being washed in the blood of Trump made Tulsi more patriotic and less likely to commit treason?

 

[Majors]

You misrepresent something I say in an effort to promote your massive Trump can do no wrong bias, but I should keep my head on a swivel?? How about turning yours away from Trumps butt for a second?

You’re big mad! So you didn’t say?

Your party got military plans hacked and accidentally looped in a reporter. Wanting to keep Congress in the dark in the name of “Op-Sec” is a joke.

Your words not mine, not sure how thats misrepresenting. Good to know you’re broken before the second cup of coffee.

 

[just bob]

And your response doesn’t address my question. If Congress in general and Dems in particular can’t be trusted….how can Gabbard be trusted? You know that members of Congress take the same oath that your trusted members of Trumps security team. Has being washed in the blood of Trump made Tulsi more patriotic and less likely to commit treason?

When did Gabbard return to congress?

 

[Majors]

And your response doesn’t address my question. If Congress in general and Dems in particular can’t be trusted….how can Gabbard be trusted? You know that members of Congress take the same oath that your trusted members of Trumps security team. Has being washed in the blood of Trump made Tulsi more patriotic and less likely to commit treason?

Easy, when Hillary had to make stuff up to stain her name because she was threat.

 

[PEPPERJAX]

I know he supported this. What about him? Does he need to send himself to a mental hospital?

You said Dems can’t be trusted.

 

[SayUWantAreVOLution]

Zero dems can be trusted. Only a few republicans can be trusted. Congress as a whole cannot be trusted with information like this. There is a 110% chance the info will be leaked.

The problem isn't with THIS President but what about if Cory Booker or some President we're EXTREMELY uncomfortable with is calling in airstrikes as they see fit?

I'm not questioning that Congress might leak sensitive battle plans, so might incompetent Executive Branch personnel.

The question is how much damage can the 3 prong system take before IT becomes useless to us. For better or worse, we need rules that each branch obeys to make this thing work.

Saying, "it's okay for this because we're in power now" is not really looking at things from your grandkid's best interest.

 

[sonofUT62]

Easy, when Hillary had to make stuff up to stain her name because she was threat.

I like Gabbard. I think she’s fine. I’m addressing the absurd claim that no Dems in Congress can be trusted.

 

[just bob]

You said Dems can’t be trusted.

This is correct. And then you used John Fetterman. Yes, that John Fetterman as an example to the contrary? That's...... that's interesting. ha

 

[Orange_Crush]

I heard they dropped them down the vent shafts..I know they are accurate, but that one after another accurate?

They had an upstart young pilot named Luke Skywalker.

 

[sonofUT62]

This is correct. And then you used John Fetterman. Yes, that John Fetterman as an example to the contrary? That's...... that's interesting. ha

What about Spanberger? By your rationale, Spanberger can’t be trusted at all but maybe Matt Gaetz could be trusted in between coke binges and DUI arrests?? Who decides which Republicans are trustworthy? Let us know all of this once you figure it out.

 

[Jax_Vol]

 

[sonofUT62]

You’re big mad! So you didn’t say?

Your words not mine, not sure how thats misrepresenting. Good to know you’re broken before the second cup of coffee.

Yeah. I said that. It’s right there. It is a joke to claim they can’t tell certain members of Congress when they couldn’t even maintain the most basic security. And no one’s broken. I still find you charming.

 

[just bob]

The problem isn't with THIS President but what about if Cory Booker or some President we're EXTREMELY uncomfortable with is calling in airstrikes as they see fit?

I'm not questioning that Congress might leak sensitive battle plans, so might incompetent Executive Branch personnel.

The question is how much damage can the 3 prong system take before IT becomes useless to us. For better or worse, we need rules that each branch obeys to make this thing work.

Saying, "it's okay for this because we're in power now" is not really looking at things from your grandkid's best interest.

We had that already with Barack Obama. Didn't really bother me. Whether or not specific strikes are agreeable I don't think congress should be notified, debate, and vote on 90% of these things. Sometimes the window of opportunity is short-lived. I'm also not stupid enough to think I know all of the intelligence with these strikes as many on here think they do. We have too many people in congress who hate this country and want to destroy it to watch it burn. To hell with them.