Iran

#4,251
#4,251
sonofUT62 said:
So if he doesn’t due it then it’s TACO. If he does do it then you try to demonize those who remind you that you were wrong and paint them as warmongers??? Noted.
Click to expand...


I thought he'd TACO out of it but he hedged his bets. I'm still conflicted about the wisdom of it, but hoping for the best and that it causes things to go in a good direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN, KB5252, Vol737 and 2 others
#4,253
#4,253
lawgator1 said:
I thought he'd TACO out of it but he hedged his bets. I'm still conflicted about the wisdom of it, but hoping for the best and that it causes things to go in a good direction.
Click to expand...
Well hopefully he's doing the opposite of what you want.
 
#4,255
#4,255
hog88 said:
Why? Israel was taking care of this, there was no need for our forces to get involved. When and we will be hit with a terrorist attack Trump will own it.
Click to expand...
LMAO, no. Iran has been attacking us for the last 4 decades, and will continue to do so with or without these strikes. Biden just allowed every terrorist in the world who wanted to be here in the last 4 years. Obama and Biden gave Iran billions to fund their terrorism. Any terrorist attack as blame spread all around.

LMAO again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN, Orange. and CagleMtnVol
#4,257
#4,257
massie hates trump




Grok

@grok

The President has authority as Commander-in-Chief to launch targeted strikes without congressional approval, particularly for urgent threats, under Article II, Section 2. Historical examples include Clinton’s 1999 Serbia strikes, Obama’s 2011 Libya campaign, and Trump’s 2020 Soleimani strike. However, Article I, Section 8 gives Congress war declaration power, implying oversight for major actions. The War Powers Resolution requires congressional notification within 48 hours and limits engagements to 60 days without approval. Significant strikes, like a hypothetical Iranian nuclear site attack, risk escalation and legal scrutiny if prolonged. The issue remains contentious, balancing executive flexibility with congressional checks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN, CagleMtnVol, SlipKidVol and 1 other person
#4,260
#4,260
MontyPython said:
Hmmm... Assuming no regime change, what's to prevent Iran from now building a nuclear facility a mile underground - beyond the reach of our bunker busters? What's going to stop them from now enriching all the Uranium that they likely moved?

You want to put American boots on the ground next to stop Iran from obtaining nukes?

Have you paused to actually think this whole thing through?

Nope.
Click to expand...
As long as Iran can’t defend their airspace, the Iranians will not be able to construct a lemonade stand, much less a sophisticated industrial facility. They have to bring in construction epuipment on the surface before they can start digging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN, CagleMtnVol, GroverCleveland and 1 other person
#4,262
#4,262
just bob said:
LMAO, no. Iran has been attacking us for the last 4 decades, and will continue to do so with or without these strikes. Biden just allowed every terrorist in the world who wanted to be here in the last 4 years. Obama and Biden gave Iran billions to fund their terrorism. Any terrorist attack as blame spread all around.

LMAO again.
Click to expand...
Any terrorist attack on US soil can be blamed on every liberal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
#4,266
#4,266
hog88 said:
Why? Israel was taking care of this, there was no need for our forces to get involved. When and we will be hit with a terrorist attack Trump will own it.
Click to expand...
Israel lacks the deep penetrating bombs and the bombers to carry such devices so no, Israel could not take care of these specific targets
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
#4,268
#4,268
Anyone remember when they closed the Straights of Hormuz and mined the Gulf? We literally dismantled their navy..same time we shot down their airliner.
 
#4,269
#4,269
jmacvols1 said:
massie hates trump




Grok

@grok

The President has authority as Commander-in-Chief to launch targeted strikes without congressional approval, particularly for urgent threats, under Article II, Section 2. Historical examples include Clinton’s 1999 Serbia strikes, Obama’s 2011 Libya campaign, and Trump’s 2020 Soleimani strike. However, Article I, Section 8 gives Congress war declaration power, implying oversight for major actions. The War Powers Resolution requires congressional notification within 48 hours and limits engagements to 60 days without approval. Significant strikes, like a hypothetical Iranian nuclear site attack, risk escalation and legal scrutiny if prolonged. The issue remains contentious, balancing executive flexibility with congressional checks.
Click to expand...


If I were TM I would hate him too. There’s been a history of pretty unnecessary verbal abuse directed at Mass from Trump. Not sure what happened tonight meets the threshold of unconstitutional.
 
#4,272
#4,272
OrangeTsar said:
As long as Iran can’t defend their airspace, the Iranians will not be able to construct a lemonade stand, much less a sophisticated industrial facility. They have to bring in construction epuipment on the surface before they can start digging which we can bomb as part of the new neverending war that Trump campaigned against.
Click to expand...
FYP
 
#4,274
#4,274
OrangeTsar said:
As long as Iran can’t defend their airspace, the Iranians will not be able to construct a lemonade stand, much less a sophisticated industrial facility. They have to bring in construction epuipment on the surface before they can start digging.
Click to expand...
Yeah. Iran has no air defense so we should be able to take out their nuclear facilities quite easily. The main worry is having terrorist attacks here in America
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top