Trump Ignores the Courts

#2,432
#2,432
n_huffhines said:
So now you're too the point you are defending Trump with guesses, LOL.

Here's a guess....I guess you won't give a **** whatever you find out sbout the details, so why say anything? Just say, "IDC. **** other people. It's not me."
Click to expand...
The article gave no details whatsoever about US citizens being deported. It would seem that you are accusing Trump with guesses, so why call out someone replying with guesses?

1747675271781.png

I guess it sounds worse to say that US citizens were among two families that were deported, making it sound like two US citizens were deported. As opposed to saying, "Two illegal families were deported and chose to take their anchor babies with them when they left".

If that's the case, it's just one more time that the media wrongly claimed that US citizens were deported. It's reasonable to surmise more of the same until given good reason not to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
#2,433
#2,433
Trump needs to push more stuff through Congress. He keeps trying to run the US Government like it is one of his businesses but it doesn't work that way.
 
#2,434
#2,434
EasternVol said:
Remember what he'd done for the last forty years. He was very well informed, one of the most informed people in the country. He just couldn't recall or process that information.
Click to expand...
I know. Joe couldn’t even remember showering with his daughter.
 
#2,441
#2,441
BigOrangeMojo said:
She nor Kavanaugh are partisan hacks...

He wanted a Sotomayor, Alito, Kagan, or Thomas type hack...
Click to expand...

Yeah, he's just the SCOTUS member who sold us out in writing the MFing PATRIOT Act to empower early 2000's Republicans (and then later D's) to absolutely run wild in violating our privacy, is all.
 
#2,442
#2,442
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, he's just the SCOTUS member who sold us out in writing the MFing PATRIOT Act to empower early 2000's Republicans (and then later D's) to absolutely run wild in violating our privacy, is all.
Click to expand...

I dont agree with all his rulings but I do like that he isnt a 100% partisan hack like 6/9 of the justices...
 
#2,448
#2,448
n_huffhines said:
I'm not really paying too much attention to SCOTUS. What rulings has he crossed the aisle on?
Click to expand...

Loading…

www.axios.com

Those within 1 standard deviation represent the middle 70%.

Only 3 justices fall in that range. Those within 2 standard deviations represent 95%. We have 4/9 of the judges who politcally are in the 5% fringes...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol and n_huffhines
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top