President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#20,626
#20,626
Orangeslice13 said:
I don’t know about the database being added in there but for a federal election regardless of state the I’m good with a federal id. The state election can be handled however the state see fit.
Click to expand...
The states run elections. How/ when is that going to be changed? Why would it be a good thing to remove that from states and give it to the Feds?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen and EasternVol
#20,630
#20,630
Orangeslice13 said:
I don’t know about the database being added in there but for a federal election regardless of state the I’m good with a federal id. The state election can be handled however the state see fit.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as a "federal" election.
 
#20,631
#20,631
utvolpj said:
The states run elections. How/ when is that going to be changed? Why would it be a good thing to remove that from states and give it to the Feds?
Click to expand...
If you are electing someone to the federal level. You follow federal rules to participate in the federal system.
State level, state rules.

If the states decide to have different levels of election because they don’t like the federal rules for their state then they are free to do so.
 
#20,632
#20,632
hog88 said:
There is no such thing as a "federal" election.
Click to expand...
If you’re sending someone from your state to participate at the federal level of government then you do so by the rules of the federal government. You are free to not participate in the federal level of government if that’s what your state chooses
 
#20,633
#20,633
utvolpj said:
You're being clowned. What does this do that a current state id didn't already do? Why do we need more federal gov't to do what is already done by states?
Click to expand...
No. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Elections in states vary in how secure they are. This increases the filter to ensure US citizens are voting in US elections.
 
#20,638
#20,638
CobbVol said:
No. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Elections in states vary in how secure they are. This increases the filter to ensure US citizens are voting in US elections.
Click to expand...
Feds taking over elections is a mole hill?

Again, please explain what this ID does that current IDs don't. Also explain why the feds now need to take over state identification laws
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
#20,639
#20,639
CobbVol said:
No, just saw as an example Election Day in California grew to Election Week, to Election Month, to Election Quarter.
Click to expand...


Did they start counting mail in ballots as they came in ? Or wait until election day ? And we're there challenges or recounts?
 
#20,641
#20,641
Orangeslice13 said:
If you’re sending someone from your state to participate at the federal level of government then you do so by the rules of the federal government. You are free to not participate in the federal level of government if that’s what your state chooses
Click to expand...

Incorrect, you do it by the rules of the individual states. House reps are there to represent the people in their districts, senate is there to represent the states and you don't vote for the president anyway.

We MUST reduce the power of the federal government, not give it more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and NorthDallas40
#20,648
#20,648
hog88 said:
Incorrect, you do it by the rules of the individual states. House reps are there to represent the people in their districts, senate is there to represent the states and you don't vote for the president anyway.

We MUST reduce the power of the federal government, not give it more.
Click to expand...

The elected representatives can change those rules if they like but having a standard is not an increase in power. If we have to have a federal government then a standard of representation only serves to prevent one group being disenfranchised at the hands of another.
 
#20,650
#20,650
Orangeslice13 said:
Not that I’m aware of. How long has she been on the job? Has the agency performance to date been better or worse under her direction?
Click to expand...
Tom Homan would have been a better choice for the top job. And frankly I’d guess he’s the one actually running the place while she does photo ops. Again like I said in the other post she’s on display for her eventual POTUS run. If what we’ve seen thus far (and no it isn’t a LOT of time but border security was a day one execution) is her game plan she isn’t going to win enough people over to win the office much less the GOP nomination
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top