Trade Wars and Tariffs

Jack Daniels again in the crosshairs. Vote for Trump = business gets hurt... again.

Per CNBC:

...The recent data on tariffs and consumer decision-making is clear: raise prices on a product due to higher import taxes, and consumers will turn to a cheaper alternative.

That doesn’t bode well for certain U.S. products, and the states where they are produced, as the U.S. and EU engage in tit-for-tat tariff threats. Think California almonds, Tennessee whiskey, and rearview mirrors from Michigan.

From 2017-2019, Tennessee whiskey exports to the European Union dropped from $362 million to $220 million amid President Donald Trump’s first term trade war, and exports remained low until the retaliatory tariffs were suspended, according to a recent research report from Trade Partnership Worldwide...

But Anthony said it is the California almonds, Tennessee whiskey, and rearview mirrors from Michigan that stand as some of the best examples of acute risk and market need — “the EU is the biggest buyer of these products and retaliatory tariffs will hurt much more.”

Brandon Daniels, CEO of corporate risk management consultant Exiger, said the retaliatory EU tariffs place American whiskey producers at a substantial competitive disadvantage.

“States like Tennessee and Kentucky, whose economies depend significantly on this luxury export, would feel acute economic pressure. This is where politics and trade policy collide at the moment,” said Daniels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
Jack Daniels again in the crosshairs. Vote for Trump = business gets hurt... again.

Per CNBC:

...The recent data on tariffs and consumer decision-making is clear: raise prices on a product due to higher import taxes, and consumers will turn to a cheaper alternative.

That doesn’t bode well for certain U.S. products, and the states where they are produced, as the U.S. and EU engage in tit-for-tat tariff threats. Think California almonds, Tennessee whiskey, and rearview mirrors from Michigan.

From 2017-2019, Tennessee whiskey exports to the European Union dropped from $362 million to $220 million amid President Donald Trump’s first term trade war, and exports remained low until the retaliatory tariffs were suspended, according to a recent research report from Trade Partnership Worldwide...

But Anthony said it is the California almonds, Tennessee whiskey, and rearview mirrors from Michigan that stand as some of the best examples of acute risk and market need — “the EU is the biggest buyer of these products and retaliatory tariffs will hurt much more.”

Brandon Daniels, CEO of corporate risk management consultant Exiger, said the retaliatory EU tariffs place American whiskey producers at a substantial competitive disadvantage.

“States like Tennessee and Kentucky, whose economies depend significantly on this luxury export, would feel acute economic pressure. This is where politics and trade policy collide at the moment,” said Daniels.
See..Phase 1: put tarrifs on goods, have our goods removed off the shelves..cripple economy and American checkbooks, build massive demand overseas.
Phase 2:?
Phase 3: Profit!
image.png
 
I went to arguably the best private school in GA. Westminster. They taught how to study and prepare. I struggled in highschool. Tennessee was easy.
I went to public high school in Kentucky. I got to where I am in spite of that education not because of it.

I guess you and I are a case study for the dissolution of the DOE.
 
I went to public high school in Kentucky. I got to where I am in spite of that education not because of it.

I guess you and I are a case study for the dissolution of the DOE.

Local school superintendents in Kentucky set the curriculum, and the Kentucky state board of education sets the standards, so it would seem that the Federal department of education had no hand in your abject ignorance.


 
Local school superintendents in Kentucky set the curriculum, and the Kentucky state board of education sets the standards, so it would seem that the Federal department of education had no hand in your abject ignorance.


So what then exactly is it that the federal Department of Education actually does? You know, other than pay a bunch of bureaucrats $400K+/year to oversee the downward spiral of America's students. Because if the states are responsible, I don't see the need for the federal version. You?
 
So what then exactly is it that the federal Department of Education actually does? You know, other than pay a bunch of bureaucrats $400K+/year to oversee the downward spiral of America's students. Because if the states are responsible, I don't see the need for the federal version. You?
Covering 20% of the Kentucky education budget at moment, and making sure low income children are fed, and kids with disabilities are actually instructed rather than warehoused to start.

 
Covering 20% of the Kentucky education budget at moment, and making sure low income children are fed, and kids with disabilities are actually instructed rather than warehoused to start.


Sorry chump. I don't care how much money they throw at it. Public education still sucks relative to what you can do with private monies. And why is the education system responsible for feeding children anyway?

The same answer you commies have always had will always get the same pathetic results. Hint: More money is not the answer, especially when you have to steal it from someone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Sorry chump. I don't care how much money they throw at it. Public education still sucks relative to what you can do with private monies. And why is the education system responsible for feeding children anyway?

The same answer you commies have always had will always get the same pathetic results. Hint: More money is not the answer, especially when you have to steal it from someone else.

Lol, I know you don't care about education.I just find it hilarious that you thought your crappy Kentucky education was crappy due to the existence of the federal department of education, because you didn't know who set the curriculum and education standards you were taught under.
 
 
Lol, I know you don't care about education.I just find it hilarious that you thought your crappy Kentucky education was crappy due to the existence of the federal department of education, because you didn't know who set the curriculum and education standards you were taught under.
That's not what I said Winston. You projected that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary

The "tariffs" wouldn't last long in my opinion. I am not clear on what this is really about but I imagine that Canada and USA would come to compromise quickly.

Really issue is MAGA against leftwing Canada regime. They were always destined to come to blows because they are on different sides of the aisle.
 
The "tariffs" wouldn't last long in my opinion. I am not clear on what this is really about but I imagine that Canada and USA would come to compromise quickly.

Really issue is MAGA against leftwing Canada regime. They were always destined to come to blows because they are on different sides of the aisle.
You make a good point with what I've bolded above. Why haven't we been informed specifically what the issue is? Are they "tariffing" our goods? If so, what goods and what is the tariff? Trump has not done a good job explaining exactly why he's doing this and the Press hasn't helped much either
 
You make a good point with what I've bolded above. Why haven't we been informed specifically what the issue is? Are they "tariffing" our goods? If so, what goods and what is the tariff? Trump has not done a good job explaining exactly why he's doing this and the Press hasn't helped much either

Does Canada really have tariffs above 200% on US dairy products?

According to the International Dairy Foods Association, the U.S. has never gotten close to exceeding the dairy quotas in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Becky Rasdall Vargas, senior vice president of trade and workforce policy at IDFA, said: “Frustratingly, the U.S. has never gotten close to exceeding our USMCA quotas because Canada has erected various protectionist measures that fly in the face of their trade obligations made under USMCA.”
 
I think it was pretty clear in his address to congress, make our trading partners open up their markets.
And Canada is one those unfair markets?

I don’t even know if it’s about that. He’s alluded to borders. I’m not sure that it’s not about that
 
Advertisement





Back
Top