President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Bitch & gripe. That's all democrats do. Why not come up w/a plan to move forward.
Anybody can sit on the sideline & complain/bitch all day but voters want change.
Al Green was asked nicely to sit down & show some respect to the Office of POTUS.
Green wants to be like a MLK type where you show a resistance & fight but not there.

That sounds great, actually. Support your family on one income. Economy booming. Standard of living increasing dramatically. Nuclear families. And the UT Vols doing well.
 
It's almost like we had the head of a major party who had the policy of "agree with me or I will ruin your career".
There is no room and certainly no acceptance of competing ideas.
I haven't followed the conversation, but I'm assuming that you are describing the Dems that weaponized the federal gov't and DOJ with lies and laundered fictitious intel to try to unseat a duly elected president and throw him in prison for the rest of his life?

That HAS to be what you're describing, so kudos for your moment of clarity and honesty. There may be hope for you yet.
 
That sounds great, actually. Support your family on one income. Economy booming. Standard of living increasing dramatically. Nuclear families. And the UT Vols doing well.
And it doesn't hurt that black people can't vote, go to schools nearest them, or even play on your beloved UT Vols? You know damn well what the person in the clip was talking about.
 
Disproportionately funded, yes. But the use of those shared services is not allocated According to Need. So off base there.

Still attacking strawmen with the “taxation is theft” offensive.

Do you ever grow weary of this tactic?
In terms of roads, schools, services...it sort of is. Anyway, my overall point is that EVERYTHING the government spends money on is to achieve some outcome. Arguing the generalization that they should seek zero social outcome is simply not realistic. The point is not to make strawman arguments -- it's to highlight the absurdity of the claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
To discuss in good faith, you as responder have to:
- discuss
- make a good post
- be sincere.

You don't want bad replies, post better.

Try again and see how it goes.
Talking about Rahm Emmanuel and some other poster all together is "high quality"?
"Make a good post" lol. When any view outside of the circle-jerk is met with stupid memes or insults, there's no discussion. Running up post counts with drivel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
Talking about Rahm Emmanuel and some other poster all together is "high quality"?
"Make a good post" lol. When any view outside of the circle-jerk is met with stupid memes or insults, there's no discussion. Running up post counts with drivel.
You don't have to participate. If it is such a horrible forum, there are many others where exceptional people, like yourself, are communicating.

BTW, did you notice i invited you to try again and you doubled down?
 
In terms of roads, schools, services...it sort of is. Anyway, my overall point is that EVERYTHING the government spends money on is to achieve some outcome. Arguing the generalization that they should seek zero social outcome is simply not realistic. The point is not to make strawman arguments -- it's to highlight the absurdity of the claim.
In no way are roads and fire services allocated based on need. All enjoy equal entitlement. Could argue the inverse of your position is true for police service.

Perhaps your arguments would be better received if they weren’t built on the backs said strawmen.
 
I wonder if we could have a documentary crew follow an item from origin to destination and interview people along the way to show how taxes and tariffs and costs get passed on to the consumer? If we could distill that into a 90 second ad buy on FOX News, we might stop World Trade War I.
You are missing the point as well though. The desired result is already being discussed. Tim Cook has already talked to Trump about moving his factories out of China. For example. How much is TSM going to invest in Arizona?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy’s Bandit
And it doesn't hurt that black people can't vote, go to schools nearest them, or even play on your beloved UT Vols? You know damn well what the person in the clip was talking about.
I will see if I can find it, but there were polls that said black people overall were happier in the 50s. They had nuclear families and weren't killing each other to the time of twice a day in places like Chicago.
 
I will see if I can find it, but there were polls that said black people overall were happier in the 50s. They had nuclear families and weren't killing each other to the time of twice a day in places like Chicago.
Oh yeah that was a truly great time to be black in America. They had their own schools, bathrooms, seats on the bus, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
It's almost like we had the head of a major party who had the policy of "agree with me or I will ruin your career".
There is no room and certainly no acceptance of competing ideas.
Meh. Lindsay Graham & John Kerry were flipping long before Donaldo came on the scene.

Kamala’s myriad flip flops had nothing to do with him either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and McDad
In no way are roads and fire services allocated based on need. All enjoy equal entitlement. Could argue the inverse of your position is true for police service.

Perhaps your arguments would be better received if they weren’t built on the backs said strawmen.

What else would he build them on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
Advertisement

Back
Top